Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 567.247 (2026)
Action to establish claim in circuit court.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
UNIFORM UNCLAIMED PROPERTY ACT
Act 29 of 1995
567.247 Action to establish claim in circuit court.
Sec. 27.
A person who is aggrieved by a decision of the administrator or whose claim has not been acted upon within 90 days after its filing may bring an action to establish the claim in the circuit court, naming the administrator as a defendant. The action shall be brought within 90 days after the decision of the administrator or within 180 days after the filing of the claim if the administrator has failed to act on it. If the aggrieved person establishes the claim in an action against the administrator, the court shall award the claimant costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
History: 1995, Act 29, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: Flint Cold Storage v. Dep't of Treasury, 776 N.W.2d 387 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).
Flint Cold Storage v. Dep't of Treasury, 776 N.W.2d 387 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “In this action brought under MCL 567.247 to recover unclaimed property, plaintiff Flint Cold Storage appeals by right the circuit court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant Department of Treasury.”
Dennis O'Connor v. Rachael Eubanks, 83 F.4th 1018 (6th Cir. 2023). “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 567.247 . And the Michigan Supreme Court has adjudicated takings claims against the State under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.”
The Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025). “, and the Walt Disney Company brought separate lawsuits in the Oakland Circuit Court against Rachael Eubanks, in her capacity as the Treasurer for the state of Michigan, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Treasurer pursuant to MCL 567.247 of the Uniform…”
Dine Brands Global Inc v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025). “, and the Walt Disney Company brought separate lawsuits in the Oakland Circuit Court against Rachael Eubanks, in her capacity as the Treasurer for the state of Michigan, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Treasurer pursuant to MCL 567.247 of the Uniform…”
Dennis O'Connor v. State of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “MCL 567.247 prescribes a procedure for a claimant who is aggrieved by a decision of the state treasurer, or whose claim has not been acted upon within 90 days of filing.”
The Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “Instead, “[i]n August 2021, plaintiffs filed separate civil lawsuits in the circuit court, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Treasurer pursuant to MCL 567.247.”5 Id. Both plaintiffs contended “that the UUPA’s statute of limitations, MCL 567.”
Dine Brands Global Inc v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “Instead, “[i]n August 2021, plaintiffs filed separate civil lawsuits in the circuit court, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Treasurer pursuant to MCL 567.247.”5 Id. Both plaintiffs contended “that the UUPA’s statute of limitations, MCL 567.”
The Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “250(2), are also in MCL 567.247 (“A person who is aggrieved by a decision of the administrator .”
Dine Brands Global Inc v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “250(2), are also in MCL 567.247 (“A person who is aggrieved by a decision of the administrator .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.