UNIFORM UNCLAIMED PROPERTY ACT
Act 29 of 1995
567.252 Maintenance of records; required time periods.
Sec. 32.
(1) A holder required to file a report under section 18, as to any property for which it has obtained the last known address of the owner, shall maintain a record of the name and last known address of the owner for 10 years, or, for the holder of records of transactions between 2 or more associations as defined under section 37(a)(2), for 5 years, after the property becomes reportable, except to the extent that a shorter time is provided in subsection (2) or by rule of the administrator.
(2) A business association that sells in this state its travelers checks, money orders, or other similar written instruments, other than third-party bank checks on which the business association is directly liable, or that provides those instruments to others for sale in this state, shall maintain a record of those instruments while they remain outstanding, indicating the state and date of issue for 3 years after the date the property is reportable.
History: 1995, Act 29, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 292, Imd. Eff. Aug. 1, 2012
Notes of Decisions
The Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025).
· cites it 6× “The panel acknowledged that MCL 567.252 requires holders “to maintain records of the name and last known address of property owners for 5 or 10 years, depending on the type of transaction at issue,” and that MCL 567.”
Dine Brands Global Inc v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025).
· cites it 6× “The panel acknowledged that MCL 567.252 requires holders “to maintain records of the name and last known address of property owners for 5 or 10 years, depending on the type of transaction at issue,” and that MCL 567.”
O the Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
“MCL 567.252. -2- Defendant, the administrator in this case, “may examine the records of a person to determine whether the person has complied with” the UUPA.”
O Dine Brands Global Inc v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
“MCL 567.252. -2- Defendant, the administrator in this case, “may examine the records of a person to determine whether the person has complied with” the UUPA.”
The Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
“MCL 567.252. -2- Defendant, the administrator in this case, “may examine the records of a person to determine whether the person has complied with” the UUPA.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 567.252(1) — 4 cases
The Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025).
“The panel acknowledged that MCL 567.252 requires holders “to maintain records of the name and last known address of property owners for 5 or 10 years, depending on the type of transaction at issue,” and that MCL 567.”
Dine Brands Global Inc v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025).
“The panel acknowledged that MCL 567.252 requires holders “to maintain records of the name and last known address of property owners for 5 or 10 years, depending on the type of transaction at issue,” and that MCL 567.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 567.252(2) — 2 cases
The Walt Disney Co. v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025).
“The panel acknowledged that MCL 567.252 requires holders “to maintain records of the name and last known address of property owners for 5 or 10 years, depending on the type of transaction at issue,” and that MCL 567.”
Dine Brands Global Inc v. Rachael Eubanks (Mich. 2025).
“The panel acknowledged that MCL 567.252 requires holders “to maintain records of the name and last known address of property owners for 5 or 10 years, depending on the type of transaction at issue,” and that MCL 567.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.