Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.101
Revised judicature act of 1961; short title.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961
Act 236 of 1961
600.101 Revised judicature act of 1961; short title.
Sec. 101.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "revised judicature act of 1961." RJA may be used as an abbreviation for the revised judicature act.
History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963
Compiler's Notes:
Former MCL 600.1 to 681.3, deriving from Act 314 of 1915 and entitled “The Judicature Act of 1915,” were repealed by Act 236 of 1961.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 147
cases (48 in the last 5 years), 1965–2026 · leading case: Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick Snyder
Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick Snyder (2018)
“The exception is codified as part of the Revised Judicature Act (RJA), MCL 600.101 et seq., in MCL 600.5855, which states: If a person who is or may be liable for any claim fraudulently conceals the existence of the claim or the identity of any person who is liable for the claim…”
Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance Association (2012)
“CAMERON AND ITS PROGENY We first considered the interplay between the one-year-back rule and the minority/insanity tolling provision in Cameron.”
S. Dearborn Envtl. Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. Dep't of Envtl. Quality (2018)
“631 of the Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.101 et seq ., and that the period in which to file an appeal is thus governed by MCR 7.”
in Re Bradley Estate (2013)
“1701, a provision of the Revised Judicature Act (RJA), MCL 600.101 et seq., that identifies potentially punishable contemptuous conduct.”
the Meisner Law Group v. Weston Downs Condominium Association (2017)
“8 The chapters discussed by plaintiff are contained within the Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.101 et seq . 9 This Court subsequently held that individual plaintiffs may not aggregate their claims to satisfy the jurisdictional minimum of the circuit court.”
People v. Houthoofd (2010)
“20 MCL 600.101 et seq. 9 did not involve venue or cite MCL 600.”
Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Department of Environmental Quality (2004)
“, MCL 600.101 et seq. I dissent because the majority’s decision subverts the purposes of the sand dunes mining act and the environmental protection act by incorrectly insulating the DEQ’s permit decision from scrutiny under the environmental protection act.”
Vanslembrouck v. Halperin (2009)
“The Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.101 et seq., does not define "statute of limitations" or "saving provision.”
Estate of Darryl Houston Price v. Lori Jean Kosmalski (2012)
“See 1846 RS, ch 130, § 10 and 1844 PA 40 , § 6 (establishing that the purchaser of a sheriff’s deed acquires the interest held by the mortgagor at the time the mortgage was executed).”
Denham v. Bedford (1980)
“Transamerica asserts that the prejudgment interest statute is inapplicable to insurance policies because the statute is a part of the Revised Judicature Act of 1961, MCL 600.101 et seq.; MSA 27A.101 et seq. According to this argument, the Legislature did not intend that the…”
Apsey v. Memorial Hospital (2005)
“§ 600.101 et seq., and retains its predecessor's language concerning affidavits "received in judicial proceedings," which our Supreme Court construed as strictly requiring that special certification accompany notarizations by out-of-state notaries public.”
Cadle Co. v. City of Kentwood (2009)
“8407(1) is in chapter 84 of the Revised Judicature Act (RJA), MCL 600.101 et seq., and provides that “[a] claim shall not be filed or prosecuted in the small claims division by an assignee of a claim or by a third party beneficiary under a third party beneficiary contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.