Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2912h (2026)

Settlement agreement.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.2912h Settlement agreement.

Sec. 2912h.

    (1) If the plaintiff in an action alleging medical malpractice enters into a settlement agreement with a defendant concerning the action, whether or not the settlement agreement was entered into under court supervision, and the defendant is licensed or registered under article 15 of the public health code, Act No. 368 of the Public Acts of 1978, being sections 333.16101 to 333.18838 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, the plaintiff's attorney and the defendant's attorney or, if the plaintiff and the defendant are not represented by attorneys, the plaintiff and the defendant shall jointly file a complete written copy of the settlement agreement with the bureau within the department of commerce responsible for health occupations licensure, registration, and discipline, within 30 days after entering into the settlement agreement.

    (2) Information filed with the department of commerce under subsection (1) is confidential except for use by the department of commerce in an investigation and is not subject to disclosure under the freedom of information act, Act No. 442 of the Public Acts of 1976, being sections 15.231 to 15.246 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

History: Add. 1993, Act 78, Eff. Apr. 1, 1994

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Griesbach v. Robert R. Ross, Pa-c., 778 N.W.2d 76 (Mich. 2010).
Griesbach v. Robert R. Ross, Pa-c., 778 N.W.2d 76 (Mich. 2010). “Plaintiff concedes that he actually knew the identity of the treating physician's assistant before serving his NOIs on the other defendants and before filing his complaint.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2912h(3) — 1 case
Griesbach v. Robert R. Ross, Pa-c., 778 N.W.2d 76 (Mich. 2010). “Plaintiff concedes that he actually knew the identity of the treating physician's assistant before serving his NOIs on the other defendants and before filing his complaint.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.