Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5005 (2026)

Repealed. 2012, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2013.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.5005 Repealed. 2012, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2013.

    Repealed. 2012, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2013.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to arbitration of claims to real estate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: In Re Nestorovski Est., 769 N.W.2d 720 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Nestorovski Est., 769 N.W.2d 720 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 20× “Prince recommended that the parties bear "their own attorney fees" and that no fees be charged to Vlado's estate. On May 31, 2006, respondent filed in the probate court "Objections to Certain Provisions" of the arbitration decision, which contested only the portions of the…”
McFerren v. B & B Inv. Grp., 655 N.W.2d 779 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “First, plaintiff argued although the parties had agreed to arbitrate the dispute, arbitration was precluded by MCL 600.5005, which prohibits submitting any issue involving fee ownership of real estate to arbitration.”
McFerren v. B & B Inv. Grp., 592 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 7× “First, plaintiff argued although the parties had agreed to arbitrate the dispute, arbitration was precluded by MCL 600.5005; MSA 27A.5005, which prohibits submitting any issue involving fee ownership of real estate to arbitration.”
Nestle Waters North Am., Inc. v. Bollman, 505 F.3d 498 (6th Cir. 2007). “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5005 . Given such a statute, it would seem most unlikely that the Deed’s silence regarding arbitration can be taken for all Nestle suggests.”
Rushton v. Meijer, Inc., 570 N.W.2d 271 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 600.5005; M.S.A. § 27A.5005. Because the act allows predispute agreements to arbitrate civil rights claims, it establishes Michigan's public policy concerning this issue.”
Parker John Surbrook v. Michigan State Police (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “These claims are also barred by the three-year statute of limitations prescribed by MCL 600.5005(2). As noted, plaintiff’s claim of racial discrimination accrued on March 5, 2021.”
Nestle Waters NA v. Bollman (6th Cir. 2007). “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5005 . Given such a statute, it would seem most unlikely that the Deed’s silence regarding arbitration can be taken for all Nestle suggests.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5005(2) — 1 case
Parker John Surbrook v. Michigan State Police (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “These claims are also barred by the three-year statute of limitations prescribed by MCL 600.5005(2). As noted, plaintiff’s claim of racial discrimination accrued on March 5, 2021.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.