Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5025 (2026)

Repealed. 2012, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2013.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961

Act 236 of 1961

600.5025 Repealed. 2012, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2013.

Repealed. 2012, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2013.

Compiler's Notes:

The repealed section pertained to enforcement of arbitration agreements and jurisdiction of circuit court.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 15 cases, 1975–2015 · leading case: Wold Architects & Engineers v. Strat, 713 N.W.2d 750 (Mich. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wold Architects & Engineers v. Strat, 713 N.W.2d 750 (Mich. 2006). · cites it 4× “] MCL 600.5025 provides: Upon the making of an agreement described in section 5001, the circuit *755 courts have jurisdiction to enforce the agreement and to render judgment on an award thereunder.”

Old Orchard by the Bay Assocs. v. Hamilton Mut. Ins., 454 N.W.2d 73 (Mich. 1990). · cites it 4× “MCL 600.5025; MSA 27A.5025. [2] Defendant Hamilton Mutual filed a motion on January 30, 1985, for summary judgment and to dismiss the arbitration.”

Fromm v. Meemic Ins., 690 N.W.2d 528 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “§ 600.5025, which provides that "circuit courts have jurisdiction to enforce the agreement and to render judgment on an award thereunder," concluded that "[t]he problem in this instance is that the parties produced a sales agreement and arbitration rules that called on the…”

Arrow Overall Supply Co. v. Peloquin Enter., 323 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 1982). · cites it 2× “5025 provides: "Upon the making of an agreement described in section 5001, the circuit courts have jurisdiction to enforce the agreement and to render judgment on an award thereunder. The court may render judgment on the award although the relief given is such that it could not…”

City of Ferndale v. Florence Cement Co., 712 N.W.2d 522 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006). “6 Because it is only “[u]pon the making of an agreement” that a circuit court obtains “jurisdiction to enforce the agreement and to render judgment on an award thereunder,” MCL 600.5025, the agreement in this case is not subject to the rules governing statutory arbitration.”

Tokar v. Albery, 671 N.W.2d 139 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “” The trial court’s enforcement and review of arbitration agreements and awards are governed by MCR 3.602. According to MCR 3.”

Brucker v. Mckinlay Transp., Inc, 557 N.W.2d 536 (Mich. 1997). “Later enforcement of a partial settlement or arbitration award is subject to familiar principles of law, including MCL 600.5025; MSA 27A.5025: Upon the making of an agreement described in [MCL 600.”

P R Post Corp. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 271 N.W.2d 521 (Mich. 1978). “By statute, circuit courts in Michigan *552 have jurisdiction to render judgment on an arbitration award, MCL 600.5025; MSA 27A.5025, and by court rule such judgments have the same force and effect as judgments in other cases.”

E. E. Tripp Excavating Contractor, Inc. v. Jackson Cnty., 230 N.W.2d 556 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975). “” MCLA 600.5025; MSA 27A.5025. An agreement for statutory arbitration calls into play GCR 1963, 769.”

City of Huntington Woods v. Ajax Paving Indus., Inc, 441 N.W.2d 99 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989). “MCL 600.5025; MSA 27A.5025 gives the circuit court jurisdiction to enforce an arbitration award.”

Detroit Auto. Inter-Ins. Exch. v. Sanford, 369 N.W.2d 239 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “In that case, the Supreme Court opined that "GCR 1963, 769 describes proceedings in the circuit court to confirm, enforce or vacate an arbitration award” and that "the jurisdictional basis on which the court may enter judgment on an award” is provided under MCL 600.5025; MSA…”

Six Clinics Holding Corp., II v. Cafcomp Sys., Inc., 119 F.3d 393 (6th Cir. 1997). “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5025 (West 1987). Michigan regulations governing arbitration provide that a court may confirm an arbitration award, unless it determines that the award should be vacated, corrected, or modified according to governing principles.”

Show all 15 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.