Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.6025 (2026)

Execution; exemptions; inventory; appraisal; expenses.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.6025 Execution; exemptions; inventory; appraisal; expenses.

Sec. 6025.

    (1) When a levy is made upon property of any class or species, which is exempt by law from execution to a specified number, amount or value, the officer levying such execution shall make inventory of so much of such property belonging to the judgment debtor as is sufficient, in the judgment of such officer, to cover the amount of the exemptions and satisfy the execution, and cause such property to be appraised at its cash value, by 2 disinterested freeholders of the township or city where the property is located, on oath to be administered by him to such appraisers.

    (2) Where a homestead is claimed and, in the judgment of the officer or the judgment creditor, exceeds in value $3,500.00, the officer shall have the homestead appraised by 6 such appraisers.

    (3) The appraisers shall make and sign an appraisal of the value of the property and parts thereof if it can be divided and deliver such appraisal to the officer, who shall deliver a copy of the appraisal to the debtor.

    (4) Appraisers are entitled to $2.00 per day each for their services, and 6 cents per mile for traveling, in going only, such amounts to be collected upon execution from the plaintiff in execution.

History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963 ;-- Am. 1963, 2nd Ex. Sess., Act 40, Imd. Eff. Dec. 27, 1963

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2017–2018 · leading case: In re Hill, 566 B.R. 891 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Hill, 566 B.R. 891 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2017). · cites it 2× “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.6025 ; Mich. Ct. R.”
Bob Woodward v. Christopher Schwartz (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “, plaintiff failed to obtain six appraisals of the property as required under MCL 600.6025(2) and to notify Chaban that the homestead was worth more than the $3,500 homestead exemption before sale under MCL 600.”
Bob Woodward v. Christopher Schwartz (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “, plaintiff failed to obtain six appraisals of the property as required under MCL 600.6025(2) and to notify Chaban that the homestead was worth more than the $3,500 homestead exemption before sale under MCL 600.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.6025(2) — 2 cases
Bob Woodward v. Christopher Schwartz (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “, plaintiff failed to obtain six appraisals of the property as required under MCL 600.6025(2) and to notify Chaban that the homestead was worth more than the $3,500 homestead exemption before sale under MCL 600.”
Bob Woodward v. Christopher Schwartz (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “, plaintiff failed to obtain six appraisals of the property as required under MCL 600.6025(2) and to notify Chaban that the homestead was worth more than the $3,500 homestead exemption before sale under MCL 600.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.