Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.631
Appeal from order, decision, or opinion of state board, commission, or agency.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961
Act 236 of 1961
600.631 Appeal from order, decision, or opinion of state board, commission, or agency.
Sec. 631.
An appeal shall lie from any order, decision, or opinion of any state board, commission, or agency, authorized under the laws of this state to promulgate rules from which an appeal or other judicial review has not otherwise been provided for by law, to the circuit court of the county of which the appellant is a resident or to the circuit court of Ingham county, which court shall have and exercise jurisdiction with respect thereto as in nonjury cases. Such appeals shall be made in accordance with the rules of the supreme court.
History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963 ;-- Am. 1974, Act 297, Eff. Apr. 1, 1975
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 108
cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1966–2026 · leading case: S. Dearborn Envtl. Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. Dep't of Envtl. Quality
S. Dearborn Envtl. Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. Dep't of Envtl. Quality (2018)
“10 Instead, AK Steel argued that South Dearborn's right to appeal a permit to install for an existing source is based in MCL 600.631 of the Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.”
South Dearborn Environmental Improvement Ass'n v. Department of Environmental Quality (2016)
“MCL 600.631. Petitions for review shall be the exclusive means to obtain judicial review of such a permit and shall be filed within 90 days after the final permit action, except that a petition may be filed after that deadline only if the petition is based solely on grounds…”
Morales v. Michigan Parole Bd. (2004)
“These consolidated appeals concern conflicting circuit court decisions regarding whether a circuit court may hear appeals under the Revised *31 Judicature Act (RJA), MCL 600.631 el seq., from the denial of parole by the Parole Board.”
Penn v. Department of Corrections (1980)
“Plaintiff had been convicted of attempted larceny from a person, MCL 750.”
Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Department of Environmental Quality (2004)
“13 circuit court pursuant to the Revised Judicature Act (RJA), MCL 600.631, and Michigan Court Rules 7.104(A), 7.”
Greenfield Construction Co. v. Department of State Highways (1978)
“[46] See MCLA 600.631; MSA 27A.631; GCR 1963, 706.”
Midland Cogeneration Venture Ltd Partnership v. Robert Naftaly (2011)
“And because the Legislature has not provided other means for judicial review of STC classification decisions, we hold that the circuit courts have jurisdiction over such appeals pursuant to MCL 600.631. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This appeal involves nine…”
Prime Time International Distributing Inc v. Dept of Treasury (2017)
“[ MCL 600.631.] However, the RJA provides an exception to the general jurisdiction of the circuit court "where exclusive jurisdiction is given in the constitution or by statute to some other court or where the circuit courts are denied jurisdiction by the constitution or…”
People of Michigan v. William Lawrence Rucker (2018)
“;] or (3) an appeal pursuant to the Revised Judicature Act (RJA), MCL 600.631. The Court then determined that review under either the APA and RJA was unavailable to prisoners because parole hearings are not contested cases and because the prisoner has no private right to parole.”
Teddy 23, LLC v. Michigan Film Office (2015)
“Regarding administrative agency appeals, this Court has stated that “[a] litigant seeking judicial review of an administrative agency’s decision has three potential avenues of relief: (1) the method of review prescribed by the statutes applicable to the particular agency; (2)…”
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Department of Environmental Quality (2013)
“in accordance with [MCL 600.631].” MCL 600.631 in turn provides that [a]n appeal shall lie from any order, decision, or opinion of any state board, commission, or agency, authorized under the laws of this state to promulgate rules from which an appeal or other judicial review…”
Top Flight Entertainment, Ltd. v. Schuette (2013)
“; Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.631 . The proceeds from a millionaire party (less “reasonable” expenses incurred to operate the event) must be “devoted exclusively” to the charitable purposes of the licensee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.