Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1699 (2026)

Award.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT


Act 371 of 2012


691.1699 Award.

Sec. 19.

    (1) An arbitrator shall make a record of an award. The record shall be signed or otherwise authenticated by any arbitrator who concurs with the award. The arbitrator or the arbitration organization shall give notice of the award, including a copy of the award, to each party to the arbitration proceeding.

    (2) An award must be made within the time specified by the agreement to arbitrate or, if not specified in the agreement, within the time ordered by the court. The court may extend or the parties to the arbitration proceeding may agree in a record to extend the time. The court or the parties may extend the time within or after the time specified or ordered. A party waives any objection that an award was not timely made unless the party gives notice of the objection to the arbitrator before receiving notice of the award.

History: 2012, Act 371, Eff. July 1, 2013

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2017–2019 · leading case: John Henry Rozanski v. Fred S Findling (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
John Henry Rozanski v. Fred S Findling (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “(f) The arbitration was conducted without proper notice of the initiation of an arbitration as required in [MCL 691.1699] so as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding.”
John Henry Rozanski v. Fred S Findling (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “(f) The arbitration was conducted without proper notice of the initiation of an arbitration as required in [MCL 691.1699] so as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding.”
Benjamin Ciotti v. Andre Harris (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” MCL 691.1699(2). The parties’ agreement required that the award be rendered “within 21 days after the conclusion of the arbitration hearing.”
Benjamin Ciotti v. Andre Harris (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” MCL 691.1699(2). The parties’ agreement required that the award be rendered “within 21 days after the conclusion of the arbitration hearing.”
Darshan Singh Grewal v. Gurmale Singh Grewal (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “1704,3 which provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (1) On motion made within 90 days after the moving party receives notice of the award under [MCL 691.1699] or within 90 days after the moving party receives notice of a modified or corrected award under [MCL 691.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1699(2) — 2 cases
Benjamin Ciotti v. Andre Harris (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” MCL 691.1699(2). The parties’ agreement required that the award be rendered “within 21 days after the conclusion of the arbitration hearing.”
Benjamin Ciotti v. Andre Harris (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” MCL 691.1699(2). The parties’ agreement required that the award be rendered “within 21 days after the conclusion of the arbitration hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.