UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT
Act 371 of 2012
691.1700 Modification or correction of award by arbitrator.
Sec. 20.
(1) On motion to an arbitrator by a party to an arbitration proceeding, the arbitrator may modify or correct an award on any of the following grounds:
(a) A ground stated in section 24(1)(a) or (c).
(b) Because the arbitrator has not made a final and definite award on a claim submitted by the parties to the arbitration proceeding.
(c) To clarify the award.
(2) A motion under subsection (1) must be made and notice given to all parties within 20 days after the moving party receives notice of the award.
(3) A party to the arbitration proceeding must give notice of any objection to the motion within 10 days after receipt of the notice.
(4) If a motion to the court is pending under section 22, 23, or 24, the court may submit the claim to the arbitrator to consider whether to modify or correct the award for any of the following grounds:
(a) A ground stated in section 24(1)(a) or (c).
(b) Because the arbitrator has not made a final and definite award upon a claim submitted by the parties to the arbitration proceeding.
(c) To clarify the award.
(5) An award modified or corrected under this section is subject to sections 19(1), 22, 23, and 24.
History: 2012, Act 371, Eff. July 1, 2013
Notes of Decisions
Simcor Constr. Inc v. Carl J Trupp III, 912 N.W.2d 216 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “, states: After a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may move the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court shall issue a confirming order unless the award is modified or corrected under [ MCL 691.1700 ] or [ MCL…”
Benjamin Ciotti v. Andre Harris (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Under MCL 691.1700, a party also has 20 days after issuance of an arbitration award to ask the arbitrator to modify or correct the award.”
Benjamin Ciotti v. Andre Harris (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Under MCL 691.1700, a party also has 20 days after issuance of an arbitration award to ask the arbitrator to modify or correct the award.”
Darshan Singh Grewal v. Gurmale Singh Grewal (Mich. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 2× “1699] or within 90 days after the moving party receives notice of a modified or corrected award under [MCL 691.1700], the court shall modify or correct the award if any of the following apply: (a) There was an evident mathematical miscalculation or an evident mistake in the…”
Singh Mgt. Co., LLC v. Singh Dev. Co., Inc. (6th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 2× “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1700 (1)(c). Specifically, Darshan and Pargat asked the arbitrator to clarify “[t]he scope of injunctive relief regarding trademark claims,” saying that the January Award “discusses certain hypothetical instances of the use of the name [i.”
Singh Mgmt. Co., LLC v. Singh Dev. Co., Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2020).
· cites it 2× “Michigan’s Uniform Arbitration Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1700 , states: 11 “(1) On motion to an arbitrator by a party to an arbitration proceeding, the arbitrator may modify or correct an award on any of the following grounds: .”
John Henry Rozanski v. Fred S Findling (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
“1702 governs the confirmation of arbitration awards and provides, in pertinent part, as follows: After a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may move the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court shall issue a…”
John Henry Rozanski v. Fred S Findling (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
“1702 governs the confirmation of arbitration awards and provides, in pertinent part, as follows: After a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may move the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court shall issue a…”
Simcor Constr. Inc v. Carl J Trupp III (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
“Thus, we hold that if a party rejects an offer of judgment, an arbitrator enters an arbitration award, and a judgment is entered as a result of a ruling on a motion to vacate the arbitration award, then the rejecting party must pay the opposing party’s actual costs unless the…”
Angela R Waller v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
“Plaintiff supports her argument by stating that the order governing the award of damages was titled an “interim opinion,” and that MCL 691.1700 allows a party to an arbitration proceeding to modify or correct an award if “the arbitrator has not made a final and definite award on…”
Kyle Morski v. Grandville Constr. & Dev. Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
“1702 addresses court confirmation of an award, and provides that “[a]fter a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may move the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court shall issue a confirming order unless the award is…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1700(1)(2) — 1 case
Darshan Singh Grewal v. Gurmale Singh Grewal (Mich. Ct. App. 2019).
“1699] or within 90 days after the moving party receives notice of a modified or corrected award under [MCL 691.1700], the court shall modify or correct the award if any of the following apply: (a) There was an evident mathematical miscalculation or an evident mistake in the…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1700(4) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.