Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1731 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TRAMPOLINE COURT SAFETY ACT

Act 11 of 2014

691.1731 Short title.

Sec. 1.

This act shall be known and may be cited as the "trampoline court safety act".

History: 2014, Act 11, Imd. Eff. Feb. 18, 2014

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2021–2024 · leading case: Raphaela Allen v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Raphaela Allen v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “116(C)(8) and (C)(10), arguing that (1) the Michigan Trampoline Court Safety Act, MTCSA, MCL 691.1731 et seq., bars plaintiff’s action because it provides that individuals who trampoline accept the danger inherent in the activity, including injuries that result from landing on…”

Scott Redmond v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “The Trampoline Safety Act, MCL 691.1731 et seq., governs Redmond’s claim.”

Scott Redmond v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “Plaintiff sought to recover damages from Spring Loaded II under a negligence theory and for Spring Loaded II’s alleged failure to comply with the Trampoline Court Safety Act, MCL 691.1731 et seq. After engaging in discovery, Spring Loaded II filed a motion for summary…”

C Raphaela Allen v. Spring Loaded I LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “First, although the Trampoline Court Safety Act, MCL 691.1731 et seq., bars claims for injuries arising out of the risks necessarily inherent in trampolining or in properly-maintained trampoline courts, I do not believe it bars claims based upon improperly installed or…”

Joshua Ray Cavins v. Bat Com. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “Michigan Airtime had posted signs at its facility stating instructions and warnings for patrons using the trampolines, as required by the Michigan Trampoline Court Safety Act (TCSA), MCL 691.1731 et seq. One of the signs contained the verbatim text of MCL 691.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.