Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 691 / Act 343 of 2016

Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1751

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

WRONGFUL IMPRISONMENT COMPENSATION ACT


Act 343 of 2016


691.1751 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "wrongful imprisonment compensation act".

History: 2016, Act 343, Eff. Mar. 29, 2017

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 41 cases (28 in the last 5 years), 2018–2025 · leading case: Davontae Sanford v. State of Michigan
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Davontae Sanford v. State of Michigan (2020) mich · cites it 4× “The question before this Court is whether the WICA authorizes compensation for the time plaintiff spent in detention before he was wrongfully convicted of a crime.”
Desmond Ricks v. State of Michigan (2021) mich · cites it 4× “Ricks was sentenced in 1987 for armed robbery and assault with intent to rob while armed, and in 1991, he was paroled with 4 years and 118 days remaining on his sentences.”
Desmond Ricks v. State of Michigan (2021) mich · cites it 4× “Ricks was sentenced in 1987 for armed robbery and assault with intent to rob while armed, and in 1991, he was paroled with 4 years and 118 days remaining on his sentences.”
Progress Michigan v. Attorney General (2020) mich · cites it 3× “(5) This section does not apply to a claim for compensation under the wrongful imprisonment compensation act, 2016 PA 343 , MCL 691.1751 to 691.1757.[9] 9 MCL 600.6431 was recently amended by 2020 PA 42 , effective March 3, 2020.”
David a Maples v. State of Michigan (2021) mich · cites it 3× “Maples was at a bar with Lawrence Roberts and James Murphy when Murphy sold cocaine to an undercover officer. Although Maples and Roberts claimed they did not know about the drug sale, they were arrested after leaving the bar.”
David a Maples v. State of Michigan (2021) mich · cites it 3× “Maples was at a bar with Lawrence Roberts and James Murphy when Murphy sold cocaine to an undercover officer. Although Maples and Roberts claimed they did not know about the drug sale, they were arrested after leaving the bar.”
Susan Christie v. Wayne State University (2023) mich · cites it 3× “6431 does not apply to a claim for compensation under the Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act (the WICA), MCL 691.1751 et seq. By amending Subsection (1) in 2020 to include the words, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section,” while simultaneously adding Subsection…”
Susan Christie v. Wayne State University (2023) mich · cites it 3× “6431 does not apply to a claim for compensation under the Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act (the WICA), MCL 691.1751 et seq. By amending Subsection (1) in 2020 to include the words, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section,” while simultaneously adding Subsection…”
Ward v. County of Wayne (2024) mied · cites it 3× “) Ward subsequently did bring such a lawsuit against the State of Michigan in the Michigan Court of Claims for compensation under the Michigan Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act (WICA), Mich. Comp. Laws 691.1751 et seq. The State of Michigan agreed to a settlement with Ward…”
Chamar Avery v. State of Michigan (2023) michctapp · cites it 2× “Plaintiff, Chamar Avery, appeals by right the Court of Claims verdict of no cause of action respecting his Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act (WICA), MCL 691.1751 et seq., claim. We affirm. I.”
Ansari v. Jimenez (2022) mied · cites it 2× “The City argued that the Court should dismiss the City as Defendant because Plaintiff released all claims against the City when Plaintiff accepted funds under the Michigan Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act, codified at Mich.”
Robinson v. Coleman (2022) mied · cites it 2× “) Robinson brings claims for libel, slander, violations of his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and violation of Michigan’s Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1751 . (See id.) The only remaining Defendant in this action is Coleman.”
Show all 41 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.