Still working: heavy queries on the fallback index can run 20-40 seconds.
Your account
Signed in as—
MCP handle—
Plan—
Your details
Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from
your research — which is not logged at all.
Your MCP token
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in
the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email.
Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps —
claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the
rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it
off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode,
which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
Pro — $30/month
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text
highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live
credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken
office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under
“Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call
904-383-7448.
In Re Capuzzi Est., 684 N.W.2d 677 (Mich. 2004). · cites it 4ד§ 700.5501 et seq. ; Kuite v. Lage, 152 Mich.”
Persinger v. Holst, 639 N.W.2d 594 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “MCL 700.5501 provides, in pertinent part: A durable power of attorney is a power of attorney by which a principal designates another as the principal’s attorney in fact in writing and the writing contains the words “This power of attorney is not affected by the principal’s…”
In Re Cummin Est., 671 N.W.2d 165 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2ד§§ 700.5501, 700.5502. Accordingly, if decedent consented to the transaction with knowledge of its details, the timing of the transaction does not prevent its enforcement.”
20231130_C362333_45_362333.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 23דThe complaint listed five counts: self-dealing (Count I), breach of duty of good faith and loyalty (Count II), violation of MCL 700.5501 (Count III), violation of MCL 600.”
Lucinda K Moench v. Frankenmuth Credit Union (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 12דGiven that there is no language indicating that the principal has a cause of action against the third party, we agree that there is no express cause of action.”
In Re Conservatorship of Bjh (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 6ד5501 set forth certain requirements of a durable power of attorney and provided, in relevant part: 4 Mifsud does not challenge the probate court’s findings with regard to any disallowed amount of the second amended third accounting.”
Laura Abbonizio v. Bank of Am. Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3דAbbonizio’s assertion that the powers of attorney were invalid because they do not comport with the formalities of a durable power of attorney under MCL 700.5501 is disingenuous. Abbonizio contests the validity of the powers of attorney based on the failure to have her signature…”
Laura Abbonizio v. Bank of Am. Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3דAbbonizio’s assertion that the powers of attorney were invalid because they do not comport with the formalities of a durable power of attorney under MCL 700.5501 is disingenuous. Abbonizio contests the validity of the powers of attorney based on the failure to have her signature…”
Perkins v. Gen. Motors, LLC (E.D. Mich. 2020). · cites it 2ד§ 700.5501 et seq., when Defendant allegedly refused to accept Plaintiff’s counsel’s tenders of power of attorney.”
Lucinda K Moench v. Frankenmuth Credit Union (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2דI write separately to simply point out that the road getting to that conclusion contains a preservation hurdle.”
People of Michigan v. Shawn Kristi Dicken (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 700.5501(1). A guardian is appointed after a person has been found to be legally incapacitated.”
in Re Trombly Est. (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “, the court’s power to order the trustee to provide statements of account and other information under MCL 700.7814(4) remains. MCL 700.7105(2)(j).”
People of Michigan v. Shawn Kristi Dicken (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 700.5501(1). A guardian is appointed after a person has been found to be legally incapacitated.”
Laura Abbonizio v. Bank of Am. Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Abbonizio’s assertion that the powers of attorney were invalid because they do not comport with the formalities of a durable power of attorney under MCL 700.5501 is disingenuous. Abbonizio contests the validity of the powers of attorney based on the failure to have her signature…”
Laura Abbonizio v. Bank of Am. Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Abbonizio’s assertion that the powers of attorney were invalid because they do not comport with the formalities of a durable power of attorney under MCL 700.5501 is disingenuous. Abbonizio contests the validity of the powers of attorney based on the failure to have her signature…”
20231130_C362333_45_362333.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “The complaint listed five counts: self-dealing (Count I), breach of duty of good faith and loyalty (Count II), violation of MCL 700.5501 (Count III), violation of MCL 600.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5501(2) — 3 cases
Laura Abbonizio v. Bank of Am. Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Abbonizio’s assertion that the powers of attorney were invalid because they do not comport with the formalities of a durable power of attorney under MCL 700.5501 is disingenuous. Abbonizio contests the validity of the powers of attorney based on the failure to have her signature…”
Laura Abbonizio v. Bank of Am. Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Abbonizio’s assertion that the powers of attorney were invalid because they do not comport with the formalities of a durable power of attorney under MCL 700.5501 is disingenuous. Abbonizio contests the validity of the powers of attorney based on the failure to have her signature…”
20231130_C362333_45_362333.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “The complaint listed five counts: self-dealing (Count I), breach of duty of good faith and loyalty (Count II), violation of MCL 700.5501 (Count III), violation of MCL 600.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5501(3) — 1 case
In Re Conservatorship of Bjh (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “5501 set forth certain requirements of a durable power of attorney and provided, in relevant part: 4 Mifsud does not challenge the probate court’s findings with regard to any disallowed amount of the second amended third accounting.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5501(3)(c) — 2 cases
in Re Trombly Est. (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “, the court’s power to order the trustee to provide statements of account and other information under MCL 700.7814(4) remains. MCL 700.7105(2)(j).”
In Re Conservatorship of Bjh (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “5501 set forth certain requirements of a durable power of attorney and provided, in relevant part: 4 Mifsud does not challenge the probate court’s findings with regard to any disallowed amount of the second amended third accounting.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5501(3)(d) — 2 cases
20231130_C362333_45_362333.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “The complaint listed five counts: self-dealing (Count I), breach of duty of good faith and loyalty (Count II), violation of MCL 700.5501 (Count III), violation of MCL 600.”
In Re Conservatorship of Bjh (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “5501 set forth certain requirements of a durable power of attorney and provided, in relevant part: 4 Mifsud does not challenge the probate court’s findings with regard to any disallowed amount of the second amended third accounting.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5501(5) — 2 cases
Lucinda K Moench v. Frankenmuth Credit Union (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “Given that there is no language indicating that the principal has a cause of action against the third party, we agree that there is no express cause of action.”
Lucinda K Moench v. Frankenmuth Credit Union (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “I write separately to simply point out that the road getting to that conclusion contains a preservation hurdle.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5501(7) — 1 case
20231130_C362333_45_362333.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “The complaint listed five counts: self-dealing (Count I), breach of duty of good faith and loyalty (Count II), violation of MCL 700.5501 (Count III), violation of MCL 600.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.