Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.7302 (2026)

Representation; conflict of interest; holder of power of revocation or amendment or power of appointment.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE


Act 386 of 1998


700.7302 Representation; conflict of interest; holder of power of revocation or amendment or power of appointment.

Sec. 7302.

    (1) To the extent there is no conflict of interest between the holder of a power of appointment and the person represented with respect to a particular question or dispute, the holder of a power of appointment, including a power of appointment in the form of a power of amendment or revocation, may represent and bind a person to the extent the person's interest, as a permissible appointee, taker in default, or otherwise, is subject to the power. For the purpose, however, of granting consent or approval to modification or termination of a trust or to deviation from its terms, including consent or approval to a settlement agreement described in section 7111, only the holder of a presently exercisable or testamentary general power of appointment may represent and bind such a person.

    (2) For purposes of subsection (1), both of the following apply:

    (a) There is no conflict of interest between the holder of a nonfiduciary power of appointment and a person whose interest is subject to the power to the extent the subject interest is liable to be extinguished by an exercise of the power.

    (b) If a power of appointment is subject to a condition precedent other than the death of the holder in the case of a testamentary power, no interest is subject to the power until the condition precedent is satisfied.

    (3) As used in this section, "nonfiduciary" means, with respect to a power of appointment, that the power is not held in a fiduciary capacity.

    

    

History: 1998, Act 386, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2009, Act 46, Eff. Apr. 1, 2010 ;-- Am. 2024, Act 1, Imd. Eff. Feb. 21, 2024

PopularName Notes:

EPIC
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2015 · leading case: In Re Adams Est., 667 N.W.2d 904 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Adams Est., 667 N.W.2d 904 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 6× “MCL 700.7302 states: Except as otherwise provided by the terms of the trust, the trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule.”
Aragona Trust v. Comm'r, 142 T.C. 165 (Tax Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “Even if the activities of the trust's non-trustee employees should be disregarded, 15 the activities of the trustees--including their activities as employees of Holiday Enterprises, LLC--should be considered in determining whether the trust materially participated in its…”
Midwest Mem'l Grp. LLC v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 3× “35a(4), as amended 2003 PA 91 , cemetery trust funds had to be invested subject to MCL 700.7302 of the estate and protected individuals code, 1998 PA 386 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.