Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.14

Officers or county agent authorized to take child into custody; notice; jail or detention facility; release of child; preliminary hearing; order; placement of child; foster care home services.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PROBATE CODE OF 1939


Act 288 of 1939


712A.14 Officers or county agent authorized to take child into custody; notice; jail or detention facility; release of child; preliminary hearing; order; placement of child; foster care home services.

Sec. 14.

    (1) Any local police officer, sheriff or deputy sheriff, state police officer, county agent or probation officer of any court of record may, without the order of the court, immediately take into custody any child who is found violating any law or ordinance, or for whom there is reasonable cause to believe is violating or has violated a personal protection order issued under section 2(h) of this chapter by the court under section 2950 or 2950a of the revised judicature act of 1961, 1961 PA 236, MCL 600.2950 and 600.2950a, or for whom there is reasonable cause to believe is violating or has violated a valid foreign protection order. If the officer or county agent takes a child coming within the provisions of this chapter into custody, he or she shall immediately attempt to notify the parent or parents, guardian, or custodian. While awaiting the arrival of the parent or parents, guardian, or custodian, a child under the age of 18 years taken into custody under the provisions of this chapter shall not be held in a jail or any other detention facility unless the child is completely isolated so as to prevent any verbal, visual, or physical contact with an adult prisoner. Unless the child requires immediate detention as provided for in this act, the officer shall accept the written promise of the parent or parents, guardian, or custodian, to bring the child to the court at a fixed time. The child shall then be released to the custody of the parent or parents, guardian, or custodian.

    (2) If a child is not released under subsection (1), the child and his or her parent or parents, guardian, or custodian, if they can be located, shall immediately be brought before the court for a preliminary hearing on the status of the child, and an order signed by a judge or a referee authorizing the filing of a complaint shall be entered or the child shall be released to his or her parent or parents, guardian, or custodian.

    (3) If a complaint is authorized under subsection (2), the order shall state where the child is to be placed, pending investigation and hearing, which placement may be in any of the following:

    (a) In the home of the child's parent, guardian, or custodian.

    (b) If a child is within the court's jurisdiction under section 2(a) of this chapter, in a suitable foster care home subject to the court's supervision. If a child is within the court's jurisdiction under section 2(b) of this chapter, the court shall not place a child in a foster care home subject to the court's supervision.

    (c) In a child care institution or child placing agency licensed by the department to receive for care children within the jurisdiction of the court.

    (d) In a suitable place of detention.

    

    

History: Add. 1944, 1st Ex. Sess., Act 54, Imd. Eff. Mar. 6, 1944 ;-- CL 1948, 712A.14 ;-- Am. 1952, Act 133, Eff. Sept. 18, 1952 ;-- Am. 1961, Act 30, Eff. Sept. 8, 1961 ;-- Am. 1966, Act 43, Eff. Mar. 10, 1967 ;-- Am. 1988, Act 224, Eff. Apr. 1, 1989 ;-- Am. 1998, Act 474, Eff. Mar. 1, 1999 ;-- Am. 2001, Act 211, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 163, Imd. Eff. June 12, 2012 ;-- Am. 2019, Act 111, Eff. Oct. 1, 2021

PopularName Notes:

Probate Code

PopularName Notes:

Juvenile Code
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1961–2026 · leading case: O'DONNELL v. Brown
O'DONNELL v. Brown (2004) miwd · cites it 3× “As Law Enforcement Officers we have the authority to immediately take children into protective custody who are endangered, according to MCL 712A.14. Because court orders vary in language and thus vary in the amount of authority we can use to execute the order, it is important…”
In the Matter of Taurus F. (1982) mich · cites it 2× “First, the third paragraph beginning "On April 3, 1978” makes a finding to establish the right of the probate court to take interim emergency custody of the child Taurus, presumably under MCL 712A.14; MSA 27.3178(598.14). 11 This section permits immediate custody of a child,…”
People v. Strunk (1990) michctapp · cites it 4× “886 and MCL 712A.14; MSA 27.3178(598.14). However, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
In Re MacOmber (1990) mich “" MCL 712A.14(3)(d); MSA 27.3178(598.14)(3)(d).”
People v. Allen (1981) michctapp “See also MCL 712A.14, 712A.16; MSA 27.3178(598.14), 27.”
In Re Huisman (1998) michctapp “, MCL 712A.14(2); MSA 27.3178(598.14)(2) (“parents, guardian, or custodian”), and MCL 712A.”
In Re Albring (1987) michctapp · cites it 2× “As required by that statute and by MCL 712A.14; MSA 27.3178(598.14), a preliminary examination was conducted on January 30, 1986, within forty-eight hours after the children had been removed from the custody of their father.”
Jordan ex rel. Jordan v. Jackson (1994) ca4 “1993) (decision by intake officer; hearing within 72 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays); Mich. Comp.Laws Ann. § 712A.14 (West 1993) and Mich.”
Ratté v. Corrigan (2013) mied · cites it 2× “963(A) and Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.14(1) are facially unconstitutional, and unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs Count II Fourteenth Amendment Violation — Substantive Due Process (All defendants) Count III Fourteenth Amendment Violation — Procedural Due Process (All…”
People v. Roberts (1961) mich · cites it 2× “That this is the legislature’s commendable purpose is evident from CLS 1956, § 712A.14 (Stat Ann 1959 Cum Supp § 27.3178[598.”
People v. Williams (1987) michctapp “See also MCL 712A.14, 712A.16; MSA 27.3178(598.14), 27.”
Kent County Department of Social Services v. Macomber (1990) mich “” MCL 712A.14(3)(d); MSA 27.3178(598.14)(3)(d).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.14(1) — 3 cases
Ratté v. Corrigan (2013) mied “963(A) and Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.14(1) are facially unconstitutional, and unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs Count II Fourteenth Amendment Violation — Substantive Due Process (All defendants) Count III Fourteenth Amendment Violation — Procedural Due Process (All…”
In Re Robinson Minors (2026) michctapp
Ratté v. Corrigan (2013) mied
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.14(2) — 1 case
In Re Huisman (1998) michctapp “, MCL 712A.14(2); MSA 27.3178(598.14)(2) (“parents, guardian, or custodian”), and MCL 712A.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.14(3)(d) — 2 cases
In Re MacOmber (1990) mich “" MCL 712A.14(3)(d); MSA 27.3178(598.14)(3)(d).”
Kent County Department of Social Services v. Macomber (1990) mich “” MCL 712A.14(3)(d); MSA 27.3178(598.14)(3)(d).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.