PROBATE CODE OF 1939
Act 288 of 1939
712A.4 Waiver of jurisdiction when child of 14 or older accused of felony.
Sec. 4.
(1) If a juvenile 14 years of age or older is accused of an act that if committed by an adult would be a felony, the judge of the family division of circuit court in the county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed may waive jurisdiction under this section upon motion of the prosecuting attorney. After waiver, the juvenile may be tried in the court having general criminal jurisdiction of the offense.
(2) Before conducting a hearing on the motion to waive jurisdiction, the court shall give notice of the hearing in the manner provided by supreme court rule to the juvenile and the prosecuting attorney and, if addresses are known, to the juvenile's parents or guardians. The notice must state clearly that a waiver of jurisdiction to a court of general criminal jurisdiction has been requested and that, if granted, the juvenile can be prosecuted for the alleged offense as though the juvenile were an adult.
(3) Before the court waives jurisdiction, the court shall determine on the record if there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed that if committed by an adult would be a felony and if there is probable cause to believe that the juvenile committed the offense. Before a juvenile may waive a probable cause hearing under this subsection, the court shall inform the juvenile that a waiver of this subsection waives the preliminary examination required under chapter VI of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175, MCL 766.1 to 766.18.
(4) Upon a showing of probable cause under subsection (3), the court shall conduct a hearing to determine if the best interests of the juvenile and the public would be served by granting a waiver of jurisdiction to the court of general criminal jurisdiction. In making its determination, the court shall consider all of the following criteria, giving greater weight to the seriousness of the alleged offense and the juvenile's prior record of delinquency than to the other criteria:
(a) The seriousness of the alleged offense in terms of community protection, including, but not limited to, the existence of any aggravating factors recognized by the sentencing guidelines and the use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon.
(b) The culpability of the juvenile in committing the alleged offense, including, but not limited to, the level of the juvenile's participation in planning and carrying out the offense and the existence of any aggravating or mitigating factors recognized by the sentencing guidelines.
(c) The juvenile's prior record of delinquency that would be a crime if committed by an adult.
(d) The juvenile's programming history, including, but not limited to, any out-of-home placement or treatment and the juvenile's past willingness to participate meaningfully in available programming.
(e) The adequacy of the programming available to rehabilitate and hold accountable the juvenile in the juvenile justice system and the juvenile's amenability to treatment.
(f) The dispositional options available for the juvenile.
(g) The juvenile's developmental maturity, emotional health, and mental health.
(h) If the juvenile is a member of a federally recognized Indian tribe, culturally honoring traditional values of the juvenile's tribe.
(i) The impact on any victim.
(5) If the court determines that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed that if committed by an adult would be a felony and that the juvenile committed the offense, the court shall waive jurisdiction of the juvenile if the court finds that the juvenile has previously been subject to the jurisdiction of the circuit court under this section, section 606 of the revised judicature act of 1961, 1961 PA 236, MCL 600.606.
(6) If legal counsel has not been retained or appointed to represent the juvenile, the court shall advise the juvenile and the juvenile's parents, guardian, custodian, or guardian ad litem of the juvenile's right to representation and appoint legal counsel. If the court appoints legal counsel, the judge may assess the cost of providing legal counsel as costs against the juvenile or those responsible for the juvenile's support, or both, if the persons to be assessed are financially able to comply.
(7) Legal counsel shall have access to records or reports provided and received by the judge as a basis for decision in proceedings for waiver of jurisdiction. A continuance must be granted at legal counsel's request if any report, information, or recommendation not previously available is introduced or developed at the hearing and the interests of justice require a continuance.
(8) The court shall enter a written order either granting or denying the motion to waive jurisdiction and the court shall state on the record or in a written opinion the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law forming the basis for entering the order. If a juvenile is waived, a transcript of the court's findings or a copy of the written opinion must be sent to the court of general criminal jurisdiction.
(9) If the court does not waive jurisdiction, a transcript of the court's findings or, if a written opinion is prepared, a copy of the written opinion must be sent to the prosecuting attorney, juvenile, or juvenile's attorney upon request.
(10) If the court waives jurisdiction, the juvenile shall be arraigned on an information filed by the prosecutor in the court of general criminal jurisdiction. The probable cause finding under subsection (3) satisfies the requirements of, and is the equivalent of, the preliminary examination required under chapter VI of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175, MCL 766.1 to 766.18.
(11) As used in this section, "felony" means an offense punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year or an offense designated by law as a felony.
History: Add. 1944, 1st Ex. Sess., Act 54, Imd. Eff. Mar. 6, 1944 ;-- Am. 1946, 1st Ex. Sess., Act 22, Imd. Eff. Feb. 26, 1946 ;-- CL 1948, 712A.4 ;-- Am. 1969, Act 140, Eff. Mar. 20, 1970 ;-- Am. 1972, Act 265, Imd. Eff. Oct. 3, 1972 ;-- Am. 1988, Act 182, Eff. Oct. 1, 1988 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 262, Eff. Jan. 1, 1997 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 409, Eff. Jan. 1, 1998 ;-- Am. 2023, Act 291, Eff. Oct. 1, 2024
FormerLaw Notes:
See section 26 of Ch. XII of Act 288 of 1939, and CL 1929, § 12839.
PopularName Notes:
Probate Code
PopularName Notes:
Juvenile Code
Notes of Decisions
People v. Williams (2001)
michctapp · cites it 17×
“900 of the court rules] do not apply to a person charged solely with an offense in which the juvenile court has waived jurisdiction pursuant to MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4)” could not be plainer.”
People v. Hana (1993)
mich · cites it 16×
“[15] The procedures for waiver are set forth in MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4) and MCR 5.”
People v. Dunbar (1985)
mich · cites it 16×
“MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4). The *385 prosecutor requested that jurisdiction be waived to Recorder's Court.”
People v. Plunkett (2010)
mich · cites it 6×
“[11] Rather, the Legislature has mandated preliminary examinations for felony charges: Except as provided in [MCL 712A.4],[ [12] ] the magistrate before whom any person is arraigned on a charge of having committed a felony shall set a day for a preliminary examination.”
People v. Fields (1972)
mich · cites it 13×
“) The statute with which we are concerned (MCLA 712A.4; MSA 27.3178 [598.4]) states: "In any case where a child over the age of 15 years is accused of any act the nature of which constitutes a felony, the judge of probate of the county wherein the offense is alleged to have been…”
In the Matter of Wilson (1982)
michctapp · cites it 16×
“The prosecutor then filed a motion requesting waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction pursuant to MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4). [2] Following a *117 "probable cause" or "phase 1" hearing held April 12, 1979, the court found probable cause to believe that Wilson committed the…”
People of Michigan v. Raymond Curtis Carp (2014)
mich · cites it 3×
“The family division of the circuit court typically has initial jurisdiction under MCL 712A.4(1) of a juvenile 14 years of age or older charged with a felony.”
People v. Schumacher (1977)
michctapp · cites it 8×
“Specifically, what is the standard of review in deciding whether waiver is proper? On this issue, MCLA 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4) and JCR 1969, 11 offer but a glimmer of insight.”
Storey v. Vasbinder (2011)
ca6 · cites it 2×
“See Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4. [7] At sentencing, Campbell attempted to enter evidence regarding the audibility of gunshots and the muffling of sound made by contact wounds, issues on which he failed to question either the medical examiners or police investigators during trial.”
People v. Gonzalez (2003)
michctapp · cites it 2×
“However, this issue is moot [8] because the jury did not find defendant Guerra guilty of that offense. All the other predicate offenses, of which defendant Guerra was convicted, occurred when he was at least eighteen years old.”
People v. Schneider (1982)
michctapp · cites it 6×
“However, such jurisdiction shall be for the limited purpose of holding a waiver hearing pursuant to MCL 712A.4; MSA *487 27.3178(598.4). Pursuant to the procedures set forth in the statute, the probate court may waive jurisdiction to the court having general criminal…”
People v. Woolfolk (2014)
michctapp · cites it 2×
“; and the adoption of the law allowing the family division to waive jurisdiction over a juvenile who has committed a felony, MCL 712A.4. The Note to the 2003 Amendment stated, in part, that the rule was amended to “conform to” certain statutory changes reducing the age of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(1) — 31 cases
People of Michigan v. Raymond Curtis Carp (2014)
mich
“The family division of the circuit court typically has initial jurisdiction under MCL 712A.4(1) of a juvenile 14 years of age or older charged with a felony.”
People v. Woolfolk (2014)
michctapp
“; and the adoption of the law allowing the family division to waive jurisdiction over a juvenile who has committed a felony, MCL 712A.4. The Note to the 2003 Amendment stated, in part, that the rule was amended to “conform to” certain statutory changes reducing the age of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(10) — 3 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(11) — 2 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(3) — 26 cases
People v. Plunkett (2010)
mich
“[11] Rather, the Legislature has mandated preliminary examinations for felony charges: Except as provided in [MCL 712A.4],[ [12] ] the magistrate before whom any person is arraigned on a charge of having committed a felony shall set a day for a preliminary examination.”
People v. Hana (1993)
mich
“[15] The procedures for waiver are set forth in MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4) and MCR 5.”
People v. Williams (2001)
michctapp
“900 of the court rules] do not apply to a person charged solely with an offense in which the juvenile court has waived jurisdiction pursuant to MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4)” could not be plainer.”
In the Matter of Wilson (1982)
michctapp
“The prosecutor then filed a motion requesting waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction pursuant to MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4). [2] Following a *117 "probable cause" or "phase 1" hearing held April 12, 1979, the court found probable cause to believe that Wilson committed the…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(4) — 41 cases
People v. Hana (1993)
mich
“[15] The procedures for waiver are set forth in MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4) and MCR 5.”
People v. Dunbar (1985)
mich
“MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4). The *385 prosecutor requested that jurisdiction be waived to Recorder's Court.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(4)(a) — 13 cases
People v. Williams (2001)
michctapp
“900 of the court rules] do not apply to a person charged solely with an offense in which the juvenile court has waived jurisdiction pursuant to MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4)” could not be plainer.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(4)(b) — 8 cases
People v. Dunbar (1985)
mich
“MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4). The *385 prosecutor requested that jurisdiction be waived to Recorder's Court.”
People v. Schumacher (1977)
michctapp
“Specifically, what is the standard of review in deciding whether waiver is proper? On this issue, MCLA 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4) and JCR 1969, 11 offer but a glimmer of insight.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(4)(c) — 7 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(4)(d) — 10 cases
People v. Dunbar (1985)
mich
“MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4). The *385 prosecutor requested that jurisdiction be waived to Recorder's Court.”
People v. Schumacher (1977)
michctapp
“Specifically, what is the standard of review in deciding whether waiver is proper? On this issue, MCLA 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4) and JCR 1969, 11 offer but a glimmer of insight.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(4)(e) — 5 cases
People v. Dunbar (1985)
mich
“MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4). The *385 prosecutor requested that jurisdiction be waived to Recorder's Court.”
People v. Schumacher (1977)
michctapp
“Specifically, what is the standard of review in deciding whether waiver is proper? On this issue, MCLA 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4) and JCR 1969, 11 offer but a glimmer of insight.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(4)(f) — 2 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(5) — 4 cases
People v. Williams (2001)
michctapp
“900 of the court rules] do not apply to a person charged solely with an offense in which the juvenile court has waived jurisdiction pursuant to MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4)” could not be plainer.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(7) — 3 cases
In the Matter of Wilson (1982)
michctapp
“The prosecutor then filed a motion requesting waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction pursuant to MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4). [2] Following a *117 "probable cause" or "phase 1" hearing held April 12, 1979, the court found probable cause to believe that Wilson committed the…”
People v. Schumacher (1977)
michctapp
“Specifically, what is the standard of review in deciding whether waiver is proper? On this issue, MCLA 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4) and JCR 1969, 11 offer but a glimmer of insight.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(8) — 2 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(9) — 1 case
People v. Hana (1993)
mich
“[15] The procedures for waiver are set forth in MCL 712A.4; MSA 27.3178(598.4) and MCR 5.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.4(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.