Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.1205 (2026)

Notice and hearing.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM CHILD-CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT


Act 195 of 2001


722.1205 Notice and hearing.

Sec. 205.

    (1) Before a child-custody determination is made under this act, notice and an opportunity to be heard in accordance with the standards of section 108 must be given to each person entitled to notice under the law of this state as in child-custody proceedings between residents of this state, a parent whose parental rights have not been previously terminated, and a person having physical custody of the child.

    (2) This act does not govern the enforceability of a child-custody determination made without notice and an opportunity to be heard.

    (3) The obligation to join a party and the right to intervene as a party in a child-custody proceeding under this act are governed by the law of this state as in child-custody proceedings between residents of this state.

History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2008–2008 · leading case: Nash v. Salter, 760 N.W.2d 612 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
Nash v. Salter, 760 N.W.2d 612 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “8 Under § 201 of the UCCJEA, a state has “extended home state jurisdiction” where it “was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the proceeding and child is absent from this State but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.1205(1) — 1 case
Nash v. Salter, 760 N.W.2d 612 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “8 Under § 201 of the UCCJEA, a state has “extended home state jurisdiction” where it “was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the proceeding and child is absent from this State but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.