Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218

False pretenses with intent to defraud; violation; penalty; enhanced sentence based on prior convictions; “false pretense” defined.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE


Act 328 of 1931


750.218 False pretenses with intent to defraud; violation; penalty; enhanced sentence based on prior convictions; “false pretense” defined.

Sec. 218.

    (1) A person who, with the intent to defraud or cheat makes or uses a false pretense to do 1 or more of the following is guilty of a crime punishable as provided in this section:

    (a) Cause a person to grant, convey, assign, demise, lease, or mortgage land or an interest in land.

    (b) Obtain a person's signature on a forged written instrument.

    (c) Obtain from a person any money or personal property or the use of any instrument, facility, article, or other valuable thing or service.

    (d) By means of a false weight or measure obtain a larger amount or quantity of property than was bargained for.

    (e) By means of a false weight or measure sell or dispose of a smaller amount or quantity of property than was bargained for.

    (2) If the land, interest in land, money, personal property, use of the instrument, facility, article, or valuable thing, service, larger amount obtained, or smaller amount sold or disposed of has a value of less than $200.00, the person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 93 days or a fine of not more than $500.00 or 3 times the value, whichever is greater, or both imprisonment and a fine.

    (3) If any of the following apply, the person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $2,000.00 or 3 times the value, whichever is greater, or both imprisonment and a fine:

    (a) The land, interest in land, money, personal property, use of the instrument, facility, article, or valuable thing, service, larger amount obtained, or smaller amount sold or disposed of has a value of $200.00 or more but less than $1,000.00.

    (b) The person violates subsection (2) and has 1 or more prior convictions for committing or attempting to commit an offense under this section or a local ordinance substantially corresponding to this section.

    (4) If any of the following apply, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00 or 3 times the value, whichever is greater, or both imprisonment and a fine:

    (a) The land, interest in land, money, personal property, use of the instrument, facility, article, or valuable thing, service, larger amount obtained, or smaller amount sold or disposed of has a value of $1,000.00 or more but less than $20,000.00.

    (b) The person violates subsection (3)(a) and has 1 or more prior convictions for committing or attempting to commit an offense under this section. For purposes of this subdivision, however, a prior conviction does not include a conviction for a violation or attempted violation of subsection (2) or (3)(b).

    (5) If any of the following apply, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $15,000.00 or 3 times the value, whichever is greater, or both imprisonment and a fine:

    (a) The land, interest in land, money, personal property, use of the instrument, facility, article, or valuable thing, service, larger amount obtained, or smaller amount sold or disposed of has a value of $20,000.00 or more but less than $50,000.00.

    (b) The person violates subsection (4)(a) and has 2 or more prior convictions for committing or attempting to commit an offense under this section. For purposes of this subdivision, however, a prior conviction does not include a conviction for a violation or attempted violation of subsection (2) or (3)(b).

    (6) If any of the following apply, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $25,000.00 or 3 times the value, whichever is greater, or both imprisonment and a fine:

    (a) The land, interest in land, money, personal property, use of the instrument, facility, article, or valuable thing, service, larger amount obtained, or smaller amount sold or disposed of has a value of $50,000.00 or more but less than $100,000.00.

    (b) The person violates subsection (5)(a) and has 2 or more prior convictions for committing or attempting to commit an offense under this section. For purposes of this subdivision, however, a prior conviction does not include a conviction for a violation or attempted violation of subsection (2) or (3)(b).

    (7) If any of the following apply, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $35,000.00 or 3 times the value, whichever is greater, or both imprisonment and a fine:

    (a) The land, interest in land, money, personal property, use of the instrument, facility, article, or valuable thing, service, larger amount obtained, or smaller amount sold or disposed of has a value of $100,000.00 or more.

    (b) The person violates subsection (6)(a) and has 2 or more prior convictions for committing or attempting to commit an offense under this section. For purposes of this subdivision, however, a prior conviction does not include a conviction for a violation or attempted violation of subsection (2) or (3)(b).

    (8) The values of land, interest in land, money, personal property, use of the instrument, facility, article, or valuable thing, service, larger amount obtained, or smaller amount sold or disposed of in separate incidents pursuant to a scheme or course of conduct within any 12-month period may be aggregated to determine the total value involved in the violation of this section.

    (9) If the prosecuting attorney intends to seek an enhanced sentence based upon the defendant having 1 or more prior convictions, the prosecuting attorney shall include on the complaint and information a statement listing the prior conviction or convictions. The existence of the defendant's prior conviction or convictions shall be determined by the court, without a jury, at sentencing or at a separate hearing for that purpose before sentencing. The existence of a prior conviction may be established by any evidence relevant for that purpose, including, but not limited to, 1 or more of the following:

    (a) A copy of the judgment of conviction.

    (b) A transcript of a prior trial, plea-taking, or sentencing.

    (c) Information contained in a presentence report.

    (d) The defendant's statement.

    (10) If the sentence for a conviction under this section is enhanced by 1 or more prior convictions, those prior convictions shall not be used to further enhance the sentence for the conviction under section 10, 11, or 12 of chapter IX of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175, MCL 769.10, 769.11, and 769.12.

    (11) As used in this section, "false pretense" includes, but is not limited to, a false or fraudulent representation, writing, communication, statement, or message, communicated by any means to another person, that the maker of the representation, writing, communication, statement, or message knows is false or fraudulent. The false pretense may be a representation regarding a past or existing fact or circumstance or a representation regarding the intention to perform a future event or to have a future event performed.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931 ;-- CL 1948, 750.218 ;-- Am. 1957, Act 69, Eff. Sept. 27, 1957 ;-- Am. 1998, Act 312, Eff. Jan. 1, 1999 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 154, Eff. Sept. 1, 2004 ;-- Am. 2011, Act 201, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012

FormerLaw Notes:

    See section 39 of Ch. 154 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5783; CL 1871, § 7590; How., § 9161; CL 1897, § 11575; CL 1915, § 15320; CL 1929, § 16916; Act 164 of 1867; Act 218 of 1879; and Act 234 of 1895.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 212 cases (27 in the last 5 years), 1951–2026 · leading case: People v. Raisbeck
People v. Raisbeck (2015) michctapp · cites it 11× ““Racketeering” is defined, in relevant part, as committing or conspiring to commit “[a] felony violation of [MCL 750.218], concerning false pretenses.”
Rummel v. Estelle (1980) scotus · cites it 2× “266, § 30 (West 1970) (fine or up to 5 years); Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218 (1968) (fine or up to 10 years); Minn.”
In RE PEOPLE v. Jory (1993) mich · cites it 6× “We are called upon to decide whether failure by a seller to disclose the existence of a mortgage on real property sold under a land contract may constitute a false pretense within the meaning of MCL 750.218; MSA 28.415. 1 *405 Although we conclude that, under some circumstances,…”
People v. Goldston (2004) mich · cites it 2× “§ 750.218. Defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence, asserting both federal and state grounds, U.”
Nijhawan v. Holder (2009) scotus “, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§750.218 , 750.271, 750.”
People v. Carter (2002) michctapp · cites it 4× “§ 750.218(4)(a), and filing a false report of a felony to the police, M.”
Kravitz v. Summersett (In re Great Lakes Comnet, Inc.) (2018) miwb · cites it 4× “Use of False Pretenses with Intent to Defraud- Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218 (1)(c) In Michigan, the crime of false pretenses is committed where a person acts with the intent to defraud or cheat by making a false pretense to, among other things, "obtain .”
People v. Lee (2016) michctapp · cites it 2× “Defendant appeals by delayed leave granted the trial court’s order of restitution following his plea of nolo contendere to a charge of false pretenses of $20,000 or more, MCL 750.218(5)(a). 1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.”
People v. Perry (2016) michctapp “253; one *592 count of false pretenses involving $1,000 or more but less than $20,000, MCL 750.218(4)(a); and one count of identity theft, MCL 445.”
People v. Lueth (2003) michctapp “Defendant appeals as of right his convictions, following a jury trial, of larceny by false pretenses of over $100, MCL 750.218, embezzlement by an agent of over $100, MCL 750.”
People v. Allen (2016) mich · cites it 2× “174(11) (embezzlement); MCL 750.218(10) (false pretenses); MCL 750.”
Matthews v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield (1998) mich · cites it 2× “§ 750.218; M.S.A. § 28.415.] [2] (1) A person shall not make or present or cause to be made or presented to a health care corporation or health care insurer a claim for payment of health care benefits knowing the claim to be false.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(1) — 4 cases
In re Bazzi (2012) mieb
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(1)(c) — 3 cases
People v. Butler-Jackson (2014) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(10) — 1 case
People v. Allen (2016) mich “174(11) (embezzlement); MCL 750.218(10) (false pretenses); MCL 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(11) — 8 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(2) — 2 cases
People v. Dewald (2005) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(3)(a) — 3 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(4) — 2 cases
People v. White (2014) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(4)(a) — 31 cases
People v. Raisbeck (2015) michctapp ““Racketeering” is defined, in relevant part, as committing or conspiring to commit “[a] felony violation of [MCL 750.218], concerning false pretenses.”
People v. Carter (2002) michctapp “§ 750.218(4)(a), and filing a false report of a felony to the police, M.”
People v. Perry (2016) michctapp “253; one *592 count of false pretenses involving $1,000 or more but less than $20,000, MCL 750.218(4)(a); and one count of identity theft, MCL 445.”
People v. Webbs (2004) michctapp
People v. Dewald (2005) michctapp
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(5) — 1 case
Buchanan v. Metz (2015) mied
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(5)(a) — 19 cases
People v. Lee (2016) michctapp “Defendant appeals by delayed leave granted the trial court’s order of restitution following his plea of nolo contendere to a charge of false pretenses of $20,000 or more, MCL 750.218(5)(a). 1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.”
People v. Caban (2007) michctapp
People v. Caban (2005) mich
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(6)(a) — 3 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(7) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(7)(A) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(7)(a) — 5 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(8) — 1 case
People v. Raisbeck (2015) michctapp ““Racketeering” is defined, in relevant part, as committing or conspiring to commit “[a] felony violation of [MCL 750.218], concerning false pretenses.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(b) — 1 case
Baidas v. Jennings (1999) mied
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.218(l)(c) — 1 case
People v. Butler-Jackson (2014) michctapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.