Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 750 / Act 328 of 1931
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a (2026)

Repealed. 2011, Act 256, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE


Act 328 of 1931


750.243a Repealed. 2011, Act 256, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012.

    Repealed. 2011, Act 256, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed sections pertained to prohibited firework sales, permits for use or sale of fireworks, transportation and storage of fireworks, and penalties for violations.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1973–2015 · leading case: Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of Berkley, 672 N.W.2d 351 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of Berkley, 672 N.W.2d 351 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 7× “The circuit court held that Peterson could continue to operate its business selling those fireworks not specifically enumerated as illegal by the Michigan fireworks statute, MCL 750.243a. 4 The order further indicated that “mines and shells” are not “of like construction” as…”
City of Detroit v. Qualls, 454 N.W.2d 374 (Mich. 1990). · cites it 4× “MCL 750.243a(3)(a)-(f); MSA 28.440(1)(3)(a)-(f).”
Stajos v. City of Lansing, 561 N.W.2d 116 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 7× “The complaint further asserted that the case arose from the fact that there are a number of well-defined categories of common fireworks recognized by the United States Department of Transportation (usdot) that are neither specifically restricted nor specifically allowed by MCL…”
Burda Bros., Inc. v. Walsh, 61 F. Supp. 2d 648 (E.D. Mich. 1999). · cites it 6× “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
People v. Elowe, 272 N.W.2d 596 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “424 (concealed weapons), and MCL 750.243a; MSA 28.440(1) (fireworks). See also Detroit v Wedlow, 17 Mich App 134, 139 ; 169 NW2d 145 (1969), where the court noted that "a legislative body can make even innocent acts unlawful if these acts have a tendency to affect or endanger…”
People v. Guy, 329 N.W.2d 435 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “MCL 750.243a; MSA 28.440(1). The fact that the criminal process was *610 not in progress or was not planned is immaterial.”
Pickelman v. Michigan State Police, 102 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Mich. 2000). · cites it 10× “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
Bushouse v. Cnty. of Kalamazoo, 93 F.R.D. 881 (W.D. Mich. 1982). “§ 750.243a et seq.; an act which the plaintiff alleges the defendants knew to have been unenforceable.”
People v. Burns, 212 N.W.2d 37 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). “Nothing contained herein should be construed as commenting upon the question of whether one who possesses a blank cartridge pistol for a lawful purpose (MCLA 750.243a[2][f]; MSA 28.440[l][2][f]) need acquire a license, or indeed whether the Legislature has even established such…”
Sandra Pletos v. Lake in the Woods Homeowners Ass'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “Until January 1, 2012, MCL 750.243a provided: (2) Sale, possession, transportation, use, prohibited.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(1)(b) — 1 case
Pickelman v. Michigan State Police, 102 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(1)(c) — 1 case
Pickelman v. Michigan State Police, 102 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(2) — 1 case
Pickelman v. Michigan State Police, 102 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(2)(C) — 1 case
Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of Berkley, 672 N.W.2d 351 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “The circuit court held that Peterson could continue to operate its business selling those fireworks not specifically enumerated as illegal by the Michigan fireworks statute, MCL 750.243a. 4 The order further indicated that “mines and shells” are not “of like construction” as…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(2)(c) — 2 cases
Burda Bros., Inc. v. Walsh, 61 F. Supp. 2d 648 (E.D. Mich. 1999). “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
Pickelman v. Michigan State Police, 102 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(2)(e) — 1 case
Burda Bros., Inc. v. Walsh, 61 F. Supp. 2d 648 (E.D. Mich. 1999). “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(3)(a) — 1 case
City of Detroit v. Qualls, 454 N.W.2d 374 (Mich. 1990). “MCL 750.243a(3)(a)-(f); MSA 28.440(1)(3)(a)-(f).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(3)(g) — 2 cases
City of Detroit v. Qualls, 454 N.W.2d 374 (Mich. 1990). “MCL 750.243a(3)(a)-(f); MSA 28.440(1)(3)(a)-(f).”
Pickelman v. Michigan State Police, 102 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(l)(b) — 1 case
Burda Bros., Inc. v. Walsh, 61 F. Supp. 2d 648 (E.D. Mich. 1999). “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.243a(l)(c) — 1 case
Burda Bros., Inc. v. Walsh, 61 F. Supp. 2d 648 (E.D. Mich. 1999). “The primary basis for plaintiffs’ claims of vagueness is the presence in § 750.243a of phrases such as “and other similar devices” (§ 750.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.