Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520n (2026)
Lifetime electronic monitoring.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE
Act 328 of 1931
750.520n Lifetime electronic monitoring.
Sec. 520n.
(1) A person convicted under section 520b or 520c for criminal sexual conduct committed by an individual 17 years old or older against an individual less than 13 years of age shall be sentenced to lifetime electronic monitoring as provided under section 85 of the corrections code of 1953, 1953 PA 232, MCL 791.285.
(2) A person who has been sentenced under this chapter to lifetime electronic monitoring under section 85 of the corrections code of 1953, 1953 PA 232, MCL 791.285, who does any of the following is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or a fine of not more than $2,000.00, or both:
(a) Intentionally removes, defaces, alters, destroys, or fails to maintain the electronic monitoring device in working order.
(b) Fails to notify the department of corrections that the electronic monitoring device is damaged.
(c) Fails to reimburse the department of corrections or its agent for the cost of the monitoring.
(3) This section does not prohibit an individual from being charged with, convicted of, or punished for any other violation of law that is committed by that individual while violating this section.
(4) A term of imprisonment imposed for a violation of this section may run consecutively to any term of imprisonment imposed for another violation arising from the same transaction.
History: Add. 2006, Act 171, Eff. Aug. 28, 2006
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 75
cases (38 in the last 5 years), 2010–2026 · leading case: People v. Brantley, 823 N.W.2d 290 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
People v. Brantley, 823 N.W.2d 290 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “ANALYSIS Defendant argues that the plain language of MCL 750.520n does not require lifetime electronic monitoring when the sexual assault victim is an adult.”
People v. King, 824 N.W.2d 258 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “The trial court sentenced defendant to two concurrent prison terms of 12 to 30 years and to lifetime electronic monitoring, MCL 750.520n. Defendant asserts two evidentiary trial errors and also asserts that lifetime electronic monitoring is not authorized by law in this case.”
People v. Johnson, 826 N.W.2d 170 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “Additionally, defendant’s judgment of sentence was amended to order defendant to lifetime electronic monitoring pursuant to MCL 750.520n. Defendant appeals as of right.”
People v. Cole, 817 N.W.2d 497 (Mich. 2012). “520c(2)(b), provides that, in addition to the prescribed term of imprisonment, “the court shall sentence the defendant to lifetime electronic monitoring under [MCL 750.520n] if the violation involved sexual contact committed by an individual 17 years of age or older against an…”
People v. Hallak, 873 N.W.2d 811 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “(b) In addition to the penalty specified in subdivision (a), the court shall sentence the defendant to lifetime electronic monitoring under [MCL 750.520n] if the violation involved sexual contact committed by an individual 17 years of age or older against an individual less than…”
People v. Kern, 794 N.W.2d 362 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “] *518 Section 520n of the Michigan Penal Code, MCL 750.520n, was added by 2006 PA 171 , effective August 28, 2006.”
People v. Comer, 879 N.W.2d 306 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “The judgment of sentence form included a line to be checked by the trial court indicating, “The defendant is subject to lifetime monitoring under MCL 750.520n.” Judge Adair did not place a checkmark on this line or otherwise indicate in the judgment of sentence that defendant…”
People of Michigan v. Hai Van Mai (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “725(13) of the SORA; see also MCL 750.520n. We affirm. I. PERTINENT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The victim in this case, JB, would often spend time at his maternal aunt’s home with his cousins while his mother worked or attended college courses.”
People of Michigan v. Justin Timothy Comer (Mich. 2017). “Defendant’s judgment of sentence contained a line to be checked by the court indicating that the defendant would be subject to lifetime electronic monitoring under MCL 750.520n, but the line was not checked, and the court did not otherwise indicate that defendant was subject to…”
People of Michigan v. Antonio Jackson (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “The judgment of sentence states: “Defendant re-sentenced pursuant to order from the Michigan Supreme Court. All other previously imposed terms and conditions remain in effect.”
People of Michigan v. Corey Deshawn Gaston (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “; however, his sentence did not include LEM as required under MCL 750.520n. Before defendant was sentenced, the trial court gave the parties time to research whether defendant’s CSC-I conviction required LEM in 2007, when the incident occurred.”
People of Michigan v. Thomas Tyrone Carter (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “Defendant’s conviction of CSC-I required the trial court to include LEM as a part of his sentence, under MCL 750.520n. See MCL 750.520b(2)(d). MCL 750.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520n(1) — 36 cases
People v. Kern, 794 N.W.2d 362 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “] *518 Section 520n of the Michigan Penal Code, MCL 750.520n, was added by 2006 PA 171 , effective August 28, 2006.”
People v. Hallak, 873 N.W.2d 811 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “(b) In addition to the penalty specified in subdivision (a), the court shall sentence the defendant to lifetime electronic monitoring under [MCL 750.520n] if the violation involved sexual contact committed by an individual 17 years of age or older against an individual less than…”
People of Michigan v. James William Freese II (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
20230221_C356217_45_356217Oc.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
People of Michigan v. Joseph Henry Santana (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520n(2) — 3 cases
People v. Hallak, 873 N.W.2d 811 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “(b) In addition to the penalty specified in subdivision (a), the court shall sentence the defendant to lifetime electronic monitoring under [MCL 750.520n] if the violation involved sexual contact committed by an individual 17 years of age or older against an individual less than…”
People of Michigan v. Christopher David Vanover (Mich. Ct. App. 2026).
People of Michigan v. Conrad Austin Vandermel (Mich. Ct. App. 2026).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520n(l) — 7 cases
People v. Brantley, 823 N.W.2d 290 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “ANALYSIS Defendant argues that the plain language of MCL 750.520n does not require lifetime electronic monitoring when the sexual assault victim is an adult.”
People v. King, 824 N.W.2d 258 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “The trial court sentenced defendant to two concurrent prison terms of 12 to 30 years and to lifetime electronic monitoring, MCL 750.520n. Defendant asserts two evidentiary trial errors and also asserts that lifetime electronic monitoring is not authorized by law in this case.”
People v. Johnson, 826 N.W.2d 170 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “Additionally, defendant’s judgment of sentence was amended to order defendant to lifetime electronic monitoring pursuant to MCL 750.520n. Defendant appeals as of right.”
People v. Cole, 817 N.W.2d 497 (Mich. 2012). “520c(2)(b), provides that, in addition to the prescribed term of imprisonment, “the court shall sentence the defendant to lifetime electronic monitoring under [MCL 750.520n] if the violation involved sexual contact committed by an individual 17 years of age or older against an…”
People v. Hallak, 873 N.W.2d 811 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “(b) In addition to the penalty specified in subdivision (a), the court shall sentence the defendant to lifetime electronic monitoring under [MCL 750.520n] if the violation involved sexual contact committed by an individual 17 years of age or older against an individual less than…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.