Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3 (2026)

Appeal by aggrieved party.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE


Act 175 of 1927


770.3 Appeal by aggrieved party.

Sec. 3.

    (1) Subject to the limitations imposed by section 12 of this chapter and except as provided in section 16, an aggrieved party shall have a right of appeal from a final judgment or trial order as follows:

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (d), in a felony or misdemeanor case tried in the circuit court, there shall be a right of appeal to the court of appeals.

    (b) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (d), in a misdemeanor or ordinance violation case tried in a municipal court in a city that adopts a resolution of approval under section 23a of the Michigan uniform municipal court act, 1956 PA 5, MCL 730.523a, or tried in the district court, there shall be a right of appeal to the circuit court in the county in which the misdemeanor or ordinance violation was committed.

    (c) In a misdemeanor or ordinance violation case tried in a municipal court in a city that does not adopt a resolution of approval under section 23a of the Michigan uniform municipal court act, 1956 PA 5, MCL 730.523a, there shall be a right of appeal as provided in chapter XIV.

    (d) All appeals from final orders and judgments based upon pleas of guilty or nolo contendere shall be by application for leave to appeal.

    (2) An appeal from an interlocutory judgment or order in a felony, misdemeanor, or ordinance violation may be taken, in the manner provided by court rules, by application for leave to appeal to the same court of which a final judgment in that case would be appealable as a matter of right under subsection (1).

    (3) After expiration of the period prescribed for timely appeal, the appellate court may grant leave to appeal from any order or judgment from which timely appeal would have been available as of right, or by leave, upon conditions prescribed by court rules.

    (4) Further appellate review of matters appealed to the circuit court under subsection (1)(b), (1)(d), or (2) may be had only upon application for leave to appeal granted by the court of appeals.

    (5) Further appellate review of matters appealed to the recorder's court under subsection (1)(c) may be had only upon application for leave to appeal granted by the court of appeals.

    (6) Further review of any matter appealed to the court of appeals under this section may be had only upon application for leave to appeal granted by the supreme court.

    (7) An appeal as of right and an appeal by application for leave to appeal provided for in this section shall be taken pursuant to and within the time prescribed by court rules.

History: 1927, Act 175, Eff. Sept. 5, 1927 ;-- CL 1929, 17357 ;-- CL 1948, 770.3 ;-- Am. 1980, Act 506, Imd. Eff. Jan. 22, 1981 ;-- Am. 1981, Act 205, Eff. Jan. 1, 1982 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 374, Imd. Eff. Dec. 27, 1994 ;-- Am. 1998, Act 407, Eff. Jan. 1, 1999 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 402, Imd. Eff. Jan. 8, 2001

FormerLaw Notes:

    See sections 1, 6, and 7 of Ch. 138 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, §§ 5332, 5337, and 5338; CL 1871, §§ 7119, 7124, and 7125; How., §§ 8678, 8683, and 8684; CL 1897, §§ 10484, 10489, and 10490; and CL 1915, §§ 14587, 14592, and 14593.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1956–2024 · leading case: Kowalski v. Tesmer, 543 U.S. 125 (2004).
Kowalski v. Tesmer, 543 U.S. 125 (2004). · cites it 2× “See Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 770.3 (West Supp.”
Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. 605 (2005). · cites it 2× “Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §770.3 (6) (West Supp.”
People v. Kaczmarek, 628 N.W.2d 484 (Mich. 2001). · cites it 4× “§ 770.3 and 1994 PA 375 , amending M.C.L.”
People v. Perks, 672 N.W.2d 902 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 7× “308 in 1994 PA 375 , and enacted MCL 770.3 in 1994 PA 374 to implement Proposal B.”
People v. Bulger, 614 N.W.2d 103 (Mich. 2000). · cites it 4× “” The Legislature subsequently enacted MCL 770.3(l)(e); MSA 28.1100(l)(e), providing for appeals from plea-based convictions by application for leave to appeal.”
State Ex Rel. Franklin v. Mcbride, 701 S.E.2d 97 (W. Va. 2009). “1 (West 2008); Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3 (6) (Supp. Lexis 2009); Mo.”
Hill v. State, 960 N.E.2d 141 (Ind. 2012). · cites it 2× “In Michigan, a person who pleads guilty (or nolo contendere ) may appeal only "by application for leave to appeal," Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 770.3 (1)(d) (West 2006); that is, Michigan requires an "application" for permission to appeal be granted by the Michigan Court of Appeals…”
People v. Harlan, 669 N.W.2d 872 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Enacting that constitutional provision into law, the Legislature has provided, in relevant part, in MCL 770.3(1): Subject to the limitations imposed by section 12 of this chapter and except as provided in section 16, an aggrieved party shall have a right of appeal from a final…”
Frederick v. Presque Isle Cnty. Circuit Judge, 476 N.W.2d 142 (Mich. 1991). · cites it 2× “cases," amended MCL 770.3(1)(a); MSA 28.1100(1)(a) to provide a right to appeal from final judgment or trial order: In a felony or misdemeanor case tried in the circuit court, recorder's court of the city of Detroit, or traffic and ordinance division of the recorder's court of…”
Gerard Joseph Palazzolo v. David G. Gorcyca, Oakland Cnty. Prosecutor, 244 F.3d 512 (6th Cir. 2001). “See Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 770.3(l)(e) (West 2000).”
People v. Cooke, 355 N.W.2d 88 (Mich. 1984). · cites it 6× “1100, effectuated by 1980 PA 506 , was intended to restrict the authority of this Court to promulgate and implement rules governing appellate practice and procedure for Michigan courts, or to resurrect limitations on the people's right of appeal previously rejected by this Court.”
Tesmer v. Granholm, 333 F.3d 683 (6th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2× “” Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 770.3 (a)(1). The statute provides exceptions to this general prohibition.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3(1) — 2 cases
People v. Harlan, 669 N.W.2d 872 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “Enacting that constitutional provision into law, the Legislature has provided, in relevant part, in MCL 770.3(1): Subject to the limitations imposed by section 12 of this chapter and except as provided in section 16, an aggrieved party shall have a right of appeal from a final…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3(1)(a) — 1 case
Frederick v. Presque Isle Cnty. Circuit Judge, 476 N.W.2d 142 (Mich. 1991). “cases," amended MCL 770.3(1)(a); MSA 28.1100(1)(a) to provide a right to appeal from final judgment or trial order: In a felony or misdemeanor case tried in the circuit court, recorder's court of the city of Detroit, or traffic and ordinance division of the recorder's court of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3(1)(d) — 2 cases
People v. Perks, 666 N.W.2d 267 (Mich. 2003).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3(1)(e) — 4 cases
People v. Kaczmarek, 628 N.W.2d 484 (Mich. 2001). “§ 770.3 and 1994 PA 375 , amending M.C.L.”
People v. Najar, 581 N.W.2d 302 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3(2) — 1 case
C People of Michigan v. Anthony Maye (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3(l)(c) — 1 case
People v. Qualls, 421 N.W.2d 248 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3(l)(d) — 2 cases
People v. Harlan, 669 N.W.2d 872 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “Enacting that constitutional provision into law, the Legislature has provided, in relevant part, in MCL 770.3(1): Subject to the limitations imposed by section 12 of this chapter and except as provided in section 16, an aggrieved party shall have a right of appeal from a final…”
People v. Perks, 672 N.W.2d 902 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “308 in 1994 PA 375 , and enacted MCL 770.3 in 1994 PA 374 to implement Proposal B.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 770.3(l)(e) — 3 cases
People v. Bulger, 614 N.W.2d 103 (Mich. 2000). “” The Legislature subsequently enacted MCL 770.3(l)(e); MSA 28.1100(l)(e), providing for appeals from plea-based convictions by application for leave to appeal.”
People v. Kaczmarek, 628 N.W.2d 484 (Mich. 2001). “§ 770.3 and 1994 PA 375 , amending M.C.L.”
Gerard Joseph Palazzolo v. David G. Gorcyca, Oakland Cnty. Prosecutor, 244 F.3d 512 (6th Cir. 2001). “See Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 770.3(l)(e) (West 2000).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.