Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 777.14h (2026)

Applicability of chapter to certain felonies; MCL 445.33 to 445.2583.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE


Act 175 of 1927


777.14h Applicability of chapter to certain felonies; MCL 445.33 to 445.2583.

Sec. 14h.

    This chapter applies to the following felonies enumerated in chapter 445 of the Michigan Compiled Laws:

    

    M.C.L.

    Category

    Class

    Description

    Stat Max

    445.33(2)(b)

    Pub ord

    E

    Mail theft – second or subsequent offense

    5

    445.65

    Pub ord

    E

    Identity theft

    5

    

    Pub ord

    D

    Identity theft – second offense

    10

    

    Pub ord

    C

    Identify theft – third or subsequent offense

    15

    445.67

    Pub ord

    E

    Solicit, obtain, possess, sell, or transfer personal identifying information of another or falsify a police report with intent to commit identity theft

    5

    

    Pub ord

    D

    Obtain, possess, sell, or transfer personal identifying information of another or falsify a police report with intent to commit identity theft – second offense

    10

    

    Pub ord

    C

    Obtain, possess, sell, or transfer personal identifying information of another or falsify a police report with intent to commit identity theft – third or subsequent offense

    15

    445.408(2)

    Pub ord

    E

    Buying or selling stolen scrap metal

    5

    445.408(3)

    Pub ord

    E

    Buying or selling stolen scrap metal – subsequent offense

    5

    445.433(2)

    Pub ord

    E

    Knowingly buying or selling stolen scrap metal or other specific items

    5

    445.487(2)

    Pub ord

    H

    Precious metal and gem dealer failure to record material matter – subsequent offense

    2

    445.488(2)

    Pub ord

    H

    Precious metal and gem dealer violations – subsequent offense

    2

    445.489

    Pub ord

    H

    Precious metal and gem dealer failing to record transaction or falsifying transaction record, or making improper purchase

    2

    445.490

    Pub ord

    H

    Precious metal and gem dealer failure to obtain a certificate of registration or retain precious item for required period

    2

    445.574(2)(c)

    Pub ord

    E

    Failure to originate and maintain record of deposits on certain containers valued at $10,000.00 or more but less than $20,000.00 with intent to defraud or cheat, or repeat offense

    5

    445.574(2)(d)

    Pub ord

    C

    Failure to originate and maintain record of deposits on certain containers valued at $20,000.00 or more but less than $50,000.00 with intent to defraud or cheat, or repeat offense

    15

    445.574(2)(e)

    Pub ord

    C

    Failure to originate and maintain record of deposits on certain containers valued at $50,000.00 or more but less than $100,000.00 with intent to defraud or cheat, or repeat offense

    15

    445.574(2)(f)

    Pub ord

    B

    Failure to originate and maintain record of deposits on certain containers valued at $100,000.00 or more with intent to defraud or cheat, or repeat offense

    20

    445.574a(2)(d)

    Pub ord

    H

    Improper return of 10,000 or more nonrefundable containers

    5

    445.574a(3)(d)

    Pub ord

    H

    Improper acceptance or delivery of 10,000 or more nonrefundable containers by dealer

    5

    445.574a(4)(d)

    Pub ord

    H

    Improper acceptance or delivery of 10,000 or more nonrefundable containers by distributor

    5

    445.667

    Pub ord

    G

    Changing, altering, or modifying reverse vending machine or data for reverse vending machine

    2

    445.779

    Pub ord

    H

    Antitrust violation

    2

    445.1505

    Pub trst

    G

    Fraudulent filing, offer, or sale of franchise

    7

    445.1508

    Pub trst

    G

    Sale of franchise without proper disclosure

    7

    445.1513

    Pub trst

    G

    Illegal offer or sale of franchise

    7

    445.1520

    Pub trst

    G

    Failure to keep or maintain record of sale of franchise

    7

    445.1521

    Pub trst

    G

    False representation of departmental finding, recommendation, or approval of franchise document

    7

    445.1523

    Pub trst

    G

    False statement of material fact to department of attorney general regarding franchise

    7

    445.1525

    Pub trst

    G

    False advertising of franchise

    7

    445.1671

    Pub trst

    E

    False statement in report required by mortgage broker or lender

    15

    445.2081

    Pub ord

    E

    Purchasing or selling stolen plastic bulk merchandise containers

    5

    445.2507(2)

    Pub ord

    F

    Violation of unsolicited commercial e-mail protection act in furtherance of crime

    4

    445.2583

    Pub trst

    F

    Establish, promote, or operate a pyramid promotional scheme

    7

    

History: Add. 2002, Act 29, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002 ;-- Am. 2003, Act 134, Eff. Sept. 30, 2003 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 457, Eff. Mar. 1, 2005 ;-- Am. 2006, Act 594, Eff. Mar. 30, 2007 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 65, Imd. Eff. Apr. 3, 2008 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 386, Imd. Eff. Dec. 29, 2008 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 430, Eff. Apr. 1, 2009 ;-- Am. 2010, Act 317, Eff. Apr. 1, 2011 ;-- Am. 2010, Act 319, Eff. Apr. 1, 2011 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 187, Imd. Eff. June 20, 2012 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 188, Eff. Sept. 11, 2018 ;-- Am. 2019, Act 49, Eff. Dec.16, 2019 ;-- Am. 2021, Act 141, Eff. Mar. 27, 2022

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: People of Michigan v. Alexander James Horton (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
People of Michigan v. Alexander James Horton (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “MCL 777.14h; MCL 777.65. -2- In this case, the prosecution’s theory was (1) that the property obtained by defendant was the blank check with respect to which defendant fraudulently filled in a payment amount of $2,000 and forged Foster’s name, (2) that the value of the check was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.