Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 777.16r (2026)

MCL 750.356(2) to 750.374; felonies to which chapter applicable.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE


Act 175 of 1927


777.16r MCL 750.356(2) to 750.374; felonies to which chapter applicable.

Sec. 16r.

    This chapter applies to the following felonies enumerated in chapter 750 of the Michigan Compiled Laws:

    

    M.C.L.

    Category

    Class

    Description

    Stat Max

    750.356(2)

    Property

    D

    Larceny involving $20,000 or more or with prior convictions

    10

    750.356(3)

    Property

    E

    Larceny involving $1,000 to $20,000 or with prior convictions

    5

    750.356a(1)

    Property

    G

    Larceny from a motor vehicle

    5

    750.356a(2)(c)

    Property

    E

    Breaking and entering a vehicle to steal $1,000 to $20,000 or with prior convictions

    5

    750.356a(2)(d)

    Property

    D

    Breaking and entering a vehicle to steal $20,000 or more or with prior convictions

    10

    750.356a(3)

    Property

    G

    Breaking and entering a vehicle to steal causing damage

    5

    750.356b

    Property

    G

    Breaking and entering a coin telephone

    4

    750.356c

    Property

    E

    Retail fraud — first degree

    5

    750.357

    Person

    D

    Larceny from the person

    10

    750.357a

    Property

    G

    Larceny of livestock

    4

    750.357b

    Property

    E

    Larceny — stealing firearms of another

    5

    750.358

    Property

    G

    Larceny from burning building

    5

    750.360

    Property

    G

    Larceny in a building

    4

    750.360a(2)(b)

    Property

    F

    Theft detection device offense with prior conviction

    4

    750.361

    Property

    H

    Trains — stealing/maliciously removing parts

    2

    750.362

    Property

    E

    Larceny by conversion involving $1,000 to $20,000 or with prior convictions

    5

    

    Property

    D

    Larceny by conversion involving $20,000 or more or with prior convictions

    10

    750.362a(2)

    Property

    D

    Larceny of rental property involving $20,000 or more or with prior convictions

    10

    750.362a(3)

    Property

    E

    Larceny of rental property involving $1,000 to $20,000 or with prior convictions

    5

    750.363

    Property

    E

    Larceny by false personation involving $1,000 to $20,000 or with prior convictions

    5

    

    Property

    D

    Larceny by false personation involving $20,000 or more

    10

    750.365

    Person

    D

    Larceny from car or persons detained or injured by accident

    20

    750.367

    Property

    E

    Larceny of trees or shrubs involving $1,000 to $20,000 or with prior convictions

    5

    

    Property

    D

    Larceny of a tree or shrub involving $20,000 or more or with prior convictions

    10

    750.367b

    Property

    E

    Airplanes — taking possession

    5

    750.368(5)

    Pub ord

    G

    Preparing, serving, or executing unauthorized process — third or subsequent offense

    4

    750.372

    Pub ord

    H

    Running or allowing lottery

    2

    750.373

    Pub ord

    H

    Selling or possessing lottery tickets

    2

    750.374

    Pub ord

    H

    Lottery violations — subsequent offense

    4

    

History: Add. 1998, Act 317, Eff. Dec. 15, 1998 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 279, Eff. Oct. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 102, Eff. July 1, 2002 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 279, Imd. Eff. May 9, 2002

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: People v. Harper, 739 N.W.2d 523 (Mich. 2007).
People v. Harper, 739 N.W.2d 523 (Mich. 2007). · cites it 6× “503; MCL 777.16r. Before imposing sentence, the trial court calculated a score for both the prior record variables (PRVs) and the offense variables (OVs).”
People v. McDaniel, 662 N.W.2d 101 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “MCL 777.16r; MCL 777.22(2); MCL 777.43(1).”
People v. Martin, 668 N.W.2d 397 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “[1] The majority correctly notes that the ten-year maximum sentence under M.C.L. § 750.357 does not render use of the intermediate sanction unlawful because the Legislature specifically included M.”
People of Michigan v. Jesse Gene Burns (Mich. 2007). · cites it 3× “503; MCL 777.16r. 3 As part of the plea agreement, the prosecutor dismissed a related embezzlement charge.”
People of Michigan v. John Edward Smith (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “MCL 777.16r. Defendant was also concurrently convicted of larceny in a building, which is classified as a crime against property.”
People of Michigan v. Annie Marie Humphries (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “See MCL 777.16r. Although the PSIR indicates that defendant has another misdemeanor conviction for possession of an altered driver’s license, MCL 257.”
People of Michigan v. Patrick Mario Thomas Jr (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “356a(3), is a crime against property, MCL 777.16r. Defendant’s instant conviction of first-degree home invasion also qualifies as a crime against a person.”
People of Michigan v. Franklin Curtis Love (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 777.16r. Counting those two crimes in addition to the sentencing offense of armed robbery, which was a crime against property, MCL 777.”
People of Michigan v. Kerry Jamar-Jones Dotson (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “Defendant’s entire argument is based on his independent calculation of the sentencing guidelines for larceny in a building, which is a Class G offense, MCL 777.16r. Because the trial court correctly scored the guidelines range for the highest-class offense and defendant does not…”
People of Michigan v. Jamar Deshawn Alexander (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Contrary to defendant’s assertion, however, a score of 10 points, instead of zero points, for OV 13 would be appropriate based on the combination of his two qualifying offenses against a person and one qualifying offense against property.”
People of Michigan v. Jamar Deshawn Alexander (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Contrary to defendant’s assertion, however, a score of 10 points, instead of zero points, for OV 13 would be appropriate based on the combination of his two qualifying offenses against a person and one qualifying offense against property.”
People of Michigan v. Darryl Keith Stewart (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “MCL 777.16r. Receiving and concealing a stolen motor vehicle, MCL 750.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.