Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 105. DIVISION OF WATERS, SOILS AND MINERALS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 105.391 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1990 c 391 art 10 s 4]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1982–2001 · leading case: Application of Christenson, 417 N.W.2d 607 (Minn. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Application of Christenson, 417 N.W.2d 607 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 20× “3 The case raises two major issues: whether Minn.Stat. § 105.391, subd. 1 (1986), which provides for published notice of the inventory and mapping of the state’s wetlands and public waters, is constitutionally valid on its face and as applied to the petitioner under the United…”
Bode v. Minnesota Dep't of Nat. Resources, 612 N.W.2d 862 (Minn. 2000). · cites it 8× “See Minn. Stat. § 105.391 , subd. 1 (Supp.1979).”
Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Todd Cnty. Hearings Unit, 356 N.W.2d 703 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 12× “Minn.Stat. § 105.391. The Todd County Hearings Unit rejected DNR-proposed designations in a number of cases, including the seven on appeal here.”
Comm'r of Nat. Resources v. Nicollet Cnty. Pub. Water/Wetlands Hearings Unit, 633 N.W.2d 25 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 105.391, subd. 1 (Supp.1979).”
Comm'r of Nat. Resources v. Lac Qui Parle Cnty. Pub. Waters/Wetlands Hearings Unit, 326 N.W.2d 655 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 3× “In the fall of 1980, pursuant to statute (Minn.Stat. § 105.391), a series of hearings were held in Lac Qui Parle County to identify public waters.”
Matter of Eigenheer, 453 N.W.2d 349 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “14 or 15, or section 105.391, subd. 1. Minn.R. 6115.0170, subp.”
In Re the Excavation of Erickson Lake Ex Rel. Lahman, 392 N.W.2d 636 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “When Minn.Stat. § 105.391 was amended in 1979, the DNR discovered its oversight regarding Erickson Lake and recommended Beltrami County classify the lake as a public water.”
In Re Kaldahl, 418 N.W.2d 532 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “37, subdivision 14 and § 105.391.” The Commissioner also found that Kaldahl violated DNR administrative rules and ordered Kaldahl to fill the channel, remove the fill below the ordinary high water mark, and restore the shoreline and channel to the condition which existed prior…”
Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Mahnomen Cnty. Hearings Unit, 407 N.W.2d 434 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 5× “Minn. Stat. § 105.391 , subd. 1 (1986). 1 The hearings unit is composed of appointees of the county board, the DNR, and a board member of the local soil and water conservation district.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.