Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 106.631 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1985 c 172 s 133]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31
cases, 1949–2002 · leading case: In Re the Establishment of Cnty. Ditch No. 11 (Bevens Creek), 511 N.W.2d 54 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994).
In Re the Establishment of Cnty. Ditch No. 11 (Bevens Creek), 511 N.W.2d 54 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). “See Minn.Stat. § 106.631 (1984). Section 106.”
In Re Improvement of Cnty. Ditch No. 11, Martin Cnty., 91 N.W.2d 657 (Minn. 1958). “2 It is also necessary to keep in mind that § 106.631, subd. 3, 3 plainly provides that when there is an appeal from an order of the board relating to benefits determined and damages allowed, the amount awarded by the jury as finally determined “shall stand for and in the place…”
Petition of Ittel, 386 N.W.2d 387 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Respondents, other landowners within the watershed, appealed the Ditch Board’s order to the district court pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 106.631, subd. 4 (1984). Upon completion of a trial de novo, the trial court found that the viewers assessed some lands solely on the basis that…”
Madison v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 585 N.W.2d 77 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “2d 158, 164 (1953) (discussing Minn.Stat. § 106.631, subd. 4 (current version at Minn.”
State Ex Rel. Mosloski v. Cnty. of Martin, 80 N.W.2d 637 (Minn. 1957). “Section 106.631, subd. 5, provides how an appeal may be taken to the supreme court by any party aggrieved by a final order or judgment rendered on appeal to the district court, or by the order made in any judicial ditch proceeding dismissing the petition therefor or establishing…”
J. L. Shiely Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R.R., 91 N.W.2d 116 (Minn. 1958). “" This court considered another statute, § 106.631, somewhat similar to the one involved here, in In re County Ditch No.”
State Ex Rel. Minnesota Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Kandiyohi Cnty. Ex Rel. Bd. of Commissioners, 359 N.W.2d 266 (Minn. 1984). “The state petitioned the district court for review of the board's determination pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 106.631 and sought to enjoin the repairs pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act.”
Appeal of Ewert v. City of Winthrop, 278 N.W.2d 545 (Minn. 1979). “This explicit grant distinguishes § 106.631 from § 429.081. In all the statutes cited by appellants, the right to jury trial was explicitly granted and the procedure for appeal is set out in detail.”
In re Jud. Ditch No. 24, 87 F. Supp. 198 (D. Minnesota 1949). “, § 106.631. Thereafter, both the Milwaukee and the Rock Island removed the matter to this court upon the theory of diversity of citizenship and the claim that the amount in controversy exceeded $3,000.”
Hawkins v. Cnty. of Kandiyohi, 48 N.W.2d 441 (Minn. 1951). “Section 106.631, subd. 4, which *302 governs the district court proceedings in matters of this kind, provides : “* * * If the court finds that the order appealed from is arbitrary, unlawful, or not supported by the evidence, it shall make such order to take the place of the…”
Mondale v. Comm'r of Taxation, 116 N.W.2d 82 (Minn. 1962). “(2d) 682, 689 , where we considered the proper meaning of the appeal provisions of § 106.631, subd. 4. We there said: "As to statutory rules of construction, see § 645.”
In re Cnty. of Douglas Jt. Cnty. Ditch No. 4, 419 N.W.2d 639 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “ISSUE Is the evidence sufficient to support the redetermination of benefits? ANALYSIS Appeals from a redetermination of benefits are considered appeals related to benefits and damages under Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.