Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 112.801 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026 Cite as: Minn. Stat. § 112.801 (2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1990 c 391 art 10 s 4]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1971–1990 · leading case: Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership (1984)
“2d at 549 (quoting Minn.Stat. § 112.801, subd. 8 (1970)). Waters is distinguishable from the present case for two reasons.”
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District v. Gayle's Marina Corp. (1990)
“Specifically, we are asked to decide whether the review procedures of the Watershed Act, Minn.Stat. § 112.801 (1988), recodified as amended at Minn.”
Robertson v. Belle Creek Watershed District (1977)
“Thus, the legislature provided for such an appeal in § 112.801, subd. 5. The appellants already have appealed this decision to the Water Resources Board and thus this question is moot on this appeal.”
Waters v. Putnam (1971)
“In the instant case, however, the legislature has directed in § 112.801, subd. 8, of the Watershed Act: “All proceedings before the [water resources] board shall be in conformity with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 15.”
In re the Appeal of Holasek (1989)
“Minn.Stat. § 112.801, subd. 1 (1988) (emphasis added).”
Gayle's Marina Corp. v. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (1990)
“The district court ruled that Minn.Stat. § 112.801, subd. 1 (1988) does not allow an appeal from the managers’ decision on a permit application.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.