§
Subdivision 1.Permit required.
It shall be unlawful for any person to construct, install or operate an emission facility, air contaminant treatment facility, treatment facility, potential air contaminant storage facility, storage facility, or system or facility related to the collection, transportation, storage, processing, or disposal of waste, or any part thereof unless otherwise exempted by any agency rule now in force or hereinafter adopted, until plans therefor shall have been submitted to the agency, and a written permit therefor shall have been granted by the agency. The requirements of this section shall not be applied to motor vehicles.
§
Subd. 2.Permits previously issued.
Any permit authorized by section 116.07, subdivision 4a issued prior to June 8, 1971, and any rule which required said prior permit, shall be valid and remain enforceable subject, however, to the right of the agency to modify or revoke said permit or amend said rule in the same manner as other permits and rules.
§
Subd. 3.Permission for alteration.
It shall be unlawful for any person to make any change in, addition to or extension of any existing system or facility specified in subdivision 1, or part thereof, that would materially alter the method or the effect of treating or disposing of any air contaminant or solid waste, or to operate said system or facility, or part thereof, so changed, added to, or extended until plans therefor shall have been submitted to the agency, and a written permit therefor shall have been granted by the agency.
Notes of Decisions
Sletten v. Ramsey County (2004)
minn · cites it 4×
“[13] For example, Minn.Stat. § 116.081 (2002) makes it unlawful for any person to construct, install or operate any storage facility related to the collection, transportation, storage, or disposal of waste, or any part thereof, without having been granted a written permit.”
United States v. Reserve Mining Company (1974)
mnd · cites it 6×
“APC 3(a)(2), Minn. Stat. §§ 116.081 and 115.07. The question of fines and penalties for failure to make discovery and violation of specific regulations and statutes such as Minn.”
Reserve Mining Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency (1975)
ca8 · cites it 6×
“dismissed; 3) that Reserve’s air emissions violate Minnesota air pollution control regulation (APC) 3 and Minn.Stat.Ann. § 116.081(1), which require that permits be obtained for the operation of certain emission facilities; 4) that Reserve’s discharge of wastes into the Dunka…”
Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc. v. Williams (1996)
minnctapp · cites it 2×
“The Commissioner reviewed the penalty calculation worksheet, a draft penalty order, the July 22 letter, Arrowhead’s response, and administrative documents and issued an administrative penalty order (APO) stating that Arrowhead violated Minn.Stat. § 116.081, subd. 1, and Minn. R.”
— Minn. Stat. § 116.081(1) — 4 cases
United States v. Reserve Mining Company (1974)
mnd
“APC 3(a)(2), Minn. Stat. §§ 116.081 and 115.07. The question of fines and penalties for failure to make discovery and violation of specific regulations and statutes such as Minn.”
Reserve Mining Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency (1975)
ca8
“dismissed; 3) that Reserve’s air emissions violate Minnesota air pollution control regulation (APC) 3 and Minn.Stat.Ann. § 116.081(1), which require that permits be obtained for the operation of certain emission facilities; 4) that Reserve’s discharge of wastes into the Dunka…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.