Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 117.02 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1969 [Repealed, 1971 c 595 s 29]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1945–1975 · leading case: Burnquist v. Cook, 19 N.W.2d 394 (Minn. 1945).
Burnquist v. Cook, 19 N.W.2d 394 (Minn. 1945). “1941, § 117.02, subd. 2 (Mason St. 1927, § 6538), defines “taking” as applied to property in the following language: “The word ‘taking’ and all words and phrases of like import include every interference, under the right of eminent domain, with the ownership, possession,…”
N. Nat. Gas Co. v. Cnty. of Blue Earth, 47 N.W.2d 106 (Minn. 1951). “2, defines “taking” as applied to property within the meaning of the general eminent domain statutes of this state as follows: “The word ‘taking’ and all words and phrases of like import include every interference, under the right of eminent domain, with the ownership,…”
Burger v. City of St. Paul, 64 N.W.2d 73 (Minn. 1954). “Section 117.02, subd. 3, defines the word “owner” as “all persons interested in such property as proprietors, tenants, encumbrancers, or otherwise.”
Iowa Elec. Light & Power Co. v. City of Fairmont, 67 N.W.2d 41 (Minn. 1954). “Section 117.02, subd. 2, defines “taking” in relation to private property.”
Brooks Inv. Co. v. City of Bloomington, 232 N.W.2d 911 (Minn. 1975). “At the time the compensation was paid in this case, Brooks was the record owner of the property.”
Swoboda v. Cnty. of Renville, 62 N.W.2d 816 (Minn. 1954). “That statute, § 117.02, subd. 3, provides: “The word ‘owner’ extends to all persons interested in such property as proprietors, tenants, encumbrancers, or otherwise.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.