Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 117.175 (2026)

Trial, Burden Of Proof, Costs

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Trial.

Such appeal may be noticed for trial and tried except as herein otherwise provided as in the case of a civil action and the court may direct that issues be framed, and require other parties to be joined and to plead therein when necessary for the proper determination of the questions involved. The owners shall go forward with the evidence and have the burden of proof as in any other civil action, with the right to open and close. The court or jury trying the case shall reassess the damages de novo and apportion the same as the evidence and justice may require. Upon request of a party to such appeal, the jury or court shall show in the verdict or order the amount of the award of damages which is to reimburse the owner for the land taken and the amount of the award of damages, if any, which is to reimburse the owner for damages to the remainder tract not taken whether or not described in the petition. The amounts awarded to each person shall also be shown separately. A commissioner in a condemnation proceeding may be called by any party as a witness to testify as to the amount and the basis of the award of commissioners and may be examined and qualified as any other witness.

Subd. 2.Fees, costs, and disbursements.

The court may, in its discretion, after a verdict has been rendered on the trial of an appeal, allow as taxable costs reasonable expert witness and appraisal fees of the owner, together with the owner's reasonable costs and disbursements. No expert witness fees, costs or disbursements shall be awarded to the petitioner regardless of who is the prevailing party.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1981–2010 · leading case: Moorhead Econ. Dev. Auth. v. Anda, 789 N.W.2d 860 (Minn. 2010).
Moorhead Econ. Dev. Auth. v. Anda, 789 N.W.2d 860 (Minn. 2010). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 117.175 (2008). In State by Humphrey v.”
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 413 N.W.2d 514 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 7× “See Minn.Stat. § 117.175, subd. 1 (1986). However, the date of the commission's award established the date on which damages for the taking must be assessed in the district court trial.”
In Re Condemnation by the Minneapolis Cmty. Dev. Agency, 447 N.W.2d 891 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 8× “2 (1988), which provides: The court may, in its discretion, after a verdict has been rendered on the trial of an appeal, allow as taxable costs reasonable expert witness fees and appraisal fees of the owner, together with the owner’s reasonable costs and disbursements.”
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co., 503 N.W.2d 799 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 117.175, subd. 1 (1992) (emphasis added).”
City of St. Louis Park v. Almor Co., 313 N.W.2d 606 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 117.175, subd. 1 (1980). The date of the commission award remains crucial to this case, however, because it constitutes the date on which damages for the taking are assessed.”
Helgeson v. Gisselbeck, 375 N.W.2d 557 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “Dissatisfied parties to a condemnation proceeding may appeal to the district court from "any award of damages embraced in the report" or "from any omission to award damages.”
City of Maplewood v. Kavanagh, 333 N.W.2d 857 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 117.175, subd. 2 (1982) provides: The court may, in its discretion, after a verdict has been rendered on the trial of an appeal, allow as taxable costs reasonable expert witness and appraisal fees of the owner, together with the owner’s reasonable costs and…”
Cnty. of Dakota v. Lyndale Terminal, 529 N.W.2d 672 (Minn. 1995). · cites it 4× “" Minn.Stat. § 117.175 (1994). This provision permits the court to join those persons who do not appear on the deed record at the initial filing of the petition but who later acquire and record interests.”
Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. ex rel. City of Richfield v. Adelmann, 590 N.W.2d 327 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 117.175, subd. 1 (1998). Moreover, the history of section 117.”
Hous. & Redevel. Auth. v. Adelmann, 590 N.W.2d 327 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 117.175, subd. 1 (1998). Moreover, the history of section 117.”
Brent Gisslen v. City of Crystal, MN, 345 F.3d 624 (8th Cir. 2003). “Minn. Stat. § 117.175 subd. 1 (2002). 3 When the judgment was entered following the jury trial, Gisslen agreed to a settlement with the City in which he was immediately paid damages in the amount awarded by the jury and waived his right to appeal.”
Cnty. of Benton ex rel. Bd. of Commissioners v. Gruszka, 386 N.W.2d 840 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 117.175 (1984) grants the landowners in a condemnation action the right to appeal to the district court from the Commissioners’ award.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.