Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 117.20 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1969 [Repealed, 1971 c 595 s 29]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases, 1943–2010 · leading case: Larson v. State, 790 N.W.2d 700 (Minn. 2010).
Larson v. State, 790 N.W.2d 700 (Minn. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 117.20 (1955) (repealed 1971).”
State v. Miller Home Dev., Inc., 50 A.L.R. 2d 1377 (Minn. 1954). · cites it 7× “In 1927 what is now § 117.20 was enacted providing that, in cases where the state was the condemnor, the costs on appeal shall be awarded the “prevailing party.”
N. States Power Co. v. Esperson, 144 N.W.2d 372 (Minn. 1966). · cites it 11× “The trial court determined that § 117.20, subd. 8(c), has application only to condemnation proceedings brought by the state or one of its political subdivisions.”
State v. Gannons Inc., 145 N.W.2d 321 (Minn. 1966). · cites it 3× “It is clear, however, that § 117.20, subd. 8(d), applies only to the taxation of particularized costs in the district court — specific costs that exist at the district court level.”
State, by Peterson v. Anderson, 19 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 1945). · cites it 2× “This, of course, Avas to comply Avith the constitutional requirement that compensation be secured before taking. Taking all the statutory provisions together, it seems not too great a strain on the judicial conscience to hold that it is the ministerial duty of the commissioner…”
State v. Bentley, 45 N.W.2d 185 (Minn. 1950). · cites it 3× “They were the prevailing parties upon the appeal in the instant case, and are entitled to costs and disbursements under § 117.20(2). Upon Petitions for Beargumbnt.”
State v. Bollenbach, 63 N.W.2d 278 (Minn. 1954). · cites it 2× “15, which provides: “The - commissioner shall acquire by * * * condemnation in the manner prescribed by section 117.20, in the name of the state, * * * parking or camping areas of not to exceed five acres, adjacent to public waters to which the public theretofore had no access…”
Larson v. State, 776 N.W.2d 727 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “In 1966, a deed describing the condemned property was finalized, indicating that the state acquired an easement for "highway purposes" across land designated as "parcel 11," under the condemnation authority of Minn.Stat. § 117.20 (1965) (repealed 1971).”
State v. Pearson, 110 N.W.2d 206 (Minn. 1961). · cites it 2× “8(c), limit an adverse party’s right to cross-examine a condemnation commissioner when called by one of the parties as its witness at the trial on appeal from the commissioners’ award of damages? (2) Is the verdict justified by the evidence? Prior to the enactment of § 117.”
Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. ex rel. City of Richfield v. Adelmann, 590 N.W.2d 327 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 4× “At the time, Minn.Stat. § 117.20, subd. 4 required among other things that the notice of appeal specify the “amount of the claim.”
Cnty. of Hennepin v. Mikulay, 194 N.W.2d 259 (Minn. 1972). · cites it 2× “1969, § 117.20, subd. 5, 1 for permission to deposit with the clerk of district court three-fourths of the amount of the award.”
State v. Rust, 98 N.W.2d 271 (Minn. 1959). “It is to be noted that § 117.20, subd. 4, provides for an appeal by “any party to the proceeding” and subd.”
— Minn. Stat. § 117.20(2) — 4 cases
State v. Miller Home Dev., Inc., 50 A.L.R. 2d 1377 (Minn. 1954). “In 1927 what is now § 117.20 was enacted providing that, in cases where the state was the condemnor, the costs on appeal shall be awarded the “prevailing party.”
State v. Bentley, 45 N.W.2d 185 (Minn. 1950). “They were the prevailing parties upon the appeal in the instant case, and are entitled to costs and disbursements under § 117.20(2). Upon Petitions for Beargumbnt.”
Hollenbeck v. State, 8 N.W.2d 613 (Minn. 1943).
State v. Anderson, 87 N.W.2d 839 (Minn. 1958).
— Minn. Stat. § 117.20(3) — 1 case
State, by Peterson v. Anderson, 19 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 1945). “This, of course, Avas to comply Avith the constitutional requirement that compensation be secured before taking. Taking all the statutory provisions together, it seems not too great a strain on the judicial conscience to hold that it is the ministerial duty of the commissioner…”
— Minn. Stat. § 117.20(4) — 3 cases
State v. Bentley, 45 N.W.2d 185 (Minn. 1950). “They were the prevailing parties upon the appeal in the instant case, and are entitled to costs and disbursements under § 117.20(2). Upon Petitions for Beargumbnt.”
State, by Peterson v. Anderson, 19 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 1945). “This, of course, Avas to comply Avith the constitutional requirement that compensation be secured before taking. Taking all the statutory provisions together, it seems not too great a strain on the judicial conscience to hold that it is the ministerial duty of the commissioner…”
State ex rel. Peterson v. Anderson, 69 N.W.2d 688 (Minn. 1955).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.