Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 121A.42 (2026)

Policy

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No public school shall deny due process or equal protection of the law to any public school pupil involved in a dismissal proceeding which may result in suspension, exclusion, or expulsion.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2001–2015 · leading case: Sagehorn v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 728, 122 F. Supp. 3d 842 (D. Minnesota 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sagehorn v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 728, 122 F. Supp. 3d 842 (D. Minnesota 2015). · cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 121A.42. .. The statute applies to “dismissals,” which are defined as “the denial of the current educational- program to any pupil, including exclusion, expulsion, and suspension.”

In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B., 750 N.W.2d 318 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “2d at 744 ; see also Minn.Stat. § 121A.42 (incorporating into PFDA guarantee of due process).”

In Re the Expulsion of I.A.L., 674 N.W.2d 741 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 121A.42 (2002); In re Expulsion of E.”

In Re the Expulsion of E.J.W. From Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 500, 632 N.W.2d 775 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 121A.42. Mathews v. Eldridge sets out three factors for determining the level of due process required: First, the.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.