Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 123. SCHOOL DISTRICTS: POWERS AND DUTIES; SERVICE COOPERATIVES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 123.35 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1953 [Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1958–2000 · leading case: Dokmo v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 459 N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dokmo v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 459 N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 1990). · cites it 24× “The trial court found further that Dokmo had waived any continuing contract rights as a substitute teacher under Minn. Stat. § 123.35 , subd. 5 (1988). The school district was then ordered to reinstate Dokmo, and appealed.”
Hudson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 77, 258 N.W.2d 594 (Minn. 1977). · cites it 10× “The trial court rejected these claims and held that plaintiff was at all times relevant a substitute teacher who had been properly hired under § 123.35, subd. 5, to replace regular teachers on leaves of absence, and that, as such, she was not entitled to a continuing contract…”
W. Area Bus. & Civic Club v. Duluth Sch. Bd. Indep. Dist. No. 709, 324 N.W.2d 361 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 7× “Minn.Stat. § 123.35, subd. 2 (1980). In the legislative scheme, these activities are, and must be, considered regular administrative tasks committed to the discretion of the elected school board members.”
Lucio v. Sch. Bd. of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 625, 574 N.W.2d 737 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 123.35, subd. 5 (1996). 4 “A qualified teacher is one holding a valid license ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ .”
Concerned Citizens for the Pres. of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 712 v. Mountain Iron-Buhl Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 712, 431 N.W.2d 601 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 8× “The supreme court characterized the change as a reorganization and held that the school board had correctly exercised its general powers to develop educational objectives and to manage resources under Minn.Stat. § 123.35, subds. 1 and 2 (1986).”
Silver Bay Area Citizens Concerned for Quality Educ. v. Lake Superior Sch. Dist. No. 381, 448 N.W.2d 92 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 123.35 (1988). New employers The district court also requires appellant to consider further evidence on the impact of new employment opportunities in the Silver Bay area.”
Emanuel v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 273, 615 N.W.2d 415 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “Although the issue before the court was interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 123.35, subd. 5 (1976) (now Minn.”
Flaherty v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 2144, 577 N.W.2d 229 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “1977) (interpreting former version of Minn.Stat. § 123.35, subd. 5). We conclude that where a school district fails to follow the statutory requirement of hiring teachers by written contract, it may not use its own failure to comply with the statute to the teacher’s disadvantage.”
Renstrom v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 261, 390 N.W.2d 25 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Even if the parties had not entered into a Joint Powers Agreement, the class sharing agreement here would have been appropriate under the general powers accorded school districts in Minn.Stat. § 123.35 (1984).”
Harms v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 300, 450 N.W.2d 571 (Minn. 1990). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 123.35, subd. 5 (1988). Other situations may arise on recall when realignment would be impractical and unreasonable.”
Dokmo v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 443 N.W.2d 231 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 12× “Although no statutory or case law definition of the term "substitute teacher" exists, Minn.Stat. § 123.35, subd. 5 (1988) provides some guidance in deciding whether a teacher is full time or a substitute.”
GME Consultants, Inc. v. Oak Grove Dev., Inc., 515 N.W.2d 74 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Appellants argue that the school district’s undeveloped land lost its pubhe character when it was leased to a farmer for profit or, alternatively, when the purchase agreement to sell it to Oak Grove was executed.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 123.35(5) — 1 case
Fitzgerald v. Saydel Consol. Sch. Dist., 345 N.W.2d 101 (Iowa 1984).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.