Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 14.45 (2026)
Rule Declared Invalid
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In proceedings under section 14.44, the court shall declare the rule invalid if it finds that it violates constitutional provisions or exceeds the statutory authority of the agency or was adopted without compliance with statutory rulemaking procedures. Any party to proceedings under section 14.44, including the agency, may appeal an adverse decision of the court of appeals to the supreme court as in other civil cases.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases, 1984–2016 · leading case: Mammenga v. State Dep't of Human Servs., 442 N.W.2d 786 (Minn. 1989).
Mammenga v. State Dep't of Human Servs., 442 N.W.2d 786 (Minn. 1989). “69, list "arbitrary or capricious" as a ground for review because a pre-enforcement challenge does not involve review of an agency decision in a particular case.”
Manufactured Hous. Inst. v. Pettersen, 347 N.W.2d 238 (Minn. 1984). “” Section 14.45 defines the scope of judicial review, stating that “[i]n proceedings under section 14.”
Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Nat. Resources, 859 N.W.2d 845 (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “Minn. Stat. § 14.45 (2014). We do not possess the authority to expand the scope of judicial review at a pre-enforcement proceeding.”
Minnesota Chamber of Com. v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 469 N.W.2d 100 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “Minn.Stat. § 14.45 (1990) defines this court’s scope of review in a pre-en-forcement challenge.”
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 437 N.W.2d 35 (Minn. 1989). “See Minn.Stat. § 14.45 *43 (1988); White Bear Lake Care Center v.”
Contested Case of Christian Nursing Ctr. v. Dep't of Human Servs., 419 N.W.2d 86 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Minn.Stat. § 14.45 (1986) provides the following scope of review: In proceedings under section 14.”
Minnesota League of Credit Unions v. Minnesota Dep't of Com., 486 N.W.2d 399 (Minn. 1992). “Petitioner, Minnesota League of Credit Unions, seeks review of the court of appeals’ decision upholding an administrative rule pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 14.45 (1991). The court of appeals held that Minn.”
Jewish Cmty. Action v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 657 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “Minn.Stat. § 14.45 (2002). Although petitioners challenge the rules on all three grounds provided in section 14.”
Minnesota League of Credit Unions v. Minnesota Dep't of Com., 467 N.W.2d 42 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “Minn.Stat. § 14.45. See Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v.”
Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 765 N.W.2d 159 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). “The reviewing court “shall declare the rule invalid if it finds that it violates constitutional provisions or exceeds the statutory authority of the agency or was adopted without compliance with statutory rule-making procedures.”
Blocher Outdoor Advert. Co. v. Minnesota Dep't of Transp., 347 N.W.2d 88 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Minn.Stat. § 14.45 (in a pre-enforcement rule challenge the court shall declare a rule invalid if it violates constitutional provisions, exceeds the statutory authority of the agency, or was adopted without compliance with statutory rulemaking procedures).”
Broen Mem'l Home v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 364 N.W.2d 436 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Minn.Stat. § 14.45 (in a pre-enforcement rule challenge the court shall declare a rule invalid if it violates constitutional provisions, exceeds the statutory authority of the agency, or was adopted without compliance with statutory rule-making procedures).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.