Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 177.33 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1996 c 386 s 13]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1986–1997 · leading case: Meyer v. Best W. Seville Plaza Hotel, 562 N.W.2d 690 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Meyer v. Best W. Seville Plaza Hotel, 562 N.W.2d 690 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 16× “Appellants sued respondents for violating the Minnesota minimum wage law, seeking to recover the “gratuities” or service charges that have accrued since 1993, along with liquidated damages, attorney fees, and costs pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 177.33 (1994) (enumerating employees’…”

Olson v. Moorhead Country Club, 568 N.W.2d 871 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “June 26,1997) that Minn. Stat. § 177.33 (1994) did not provide employees a private cause of action for the recovery of unpaid gratuities.”

In Re Wage & Hour Violations of Holly Inn, Inc., 386 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 3× “The employee’s remedies were explicitly outlined in section 177.33: An employer who pays an employee less than the wages and overtime compensation to which the employee is entitled under sections 177.”

Ziegler v. Leo A. Hoffmann Ctr., Inc., 397 N.W.2d 378 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 177.33 (1984). In addition to the statutory basis for a claim of wrongful withholding of overtime pay, the Hoffmann Center’s employment manual states that an employee may opt for overtime pay or compensatory time off for overtime hours worked.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.