Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 179.15 (2026)

Violators Not Entitled To Benefits Of Certain Sections

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any employer, employee, or labor organization who has violated any of the provisions of sections 179.01 to 179.17 with respect to any labor dispute shall not be entitled to any of the benefits of sections 179.01 to 179.17 respecting such labor disputes and such employer, employee, or labor organization shall not be entitled to maintain in any court of this state an action for injunctive relief with respect to any matters growing out of that labor dispute, until good faith use is made of all means available under the laws of the state of Minnesota for the peaceable settlement of the dispute.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1992–1994 · leading case: Midwest Motor Express, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Local 120, 512 N.W.2d 881 (Minn. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Midwest Motor Express, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Local 120, 512 N.W.2d 881 (Minn. 1994). · cites it 4× “A court may enjoin an unfair labor practice, Minn.”

Employers Ass'n v. United Steelworkers of Am., 803 F. Supp. 1558 (D. Minnesota 1992). “An employer who violates the Striker Replacement Law is then precluded from exercising its own remedies which would otherwise be available under the MLRA.”

Employers Ass'n v. United Steelworkers of Am., 32 F.3d 1297 (8th Cir. 1994). “Minn.Stat. § 179.15. 3 This lawsuit arose amidst a series of negotiations, beginning September 16, 1991, between one of the Association’s members, Northern Hydraulics, and the Steelworkers.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.