Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 179A.051 (2026)

Appeals Of Commissioner's Decisions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Decisions of the commissioner relating to supervisory, confidential, essential, and professional employees, appropriateness of a unit, or fair share fee challenges may be reviewed on certiorari by the court of appeals. A petition for a writ of certiorari must be filed and served on the other party or parties and the commissioner within 30 days from the date of the mailing of the commissioner's decision. The petition must be served on the other party or parties at the party's or parties' last known address.

(b) Decisions of the commissioner relating to unfair labor practices under section 179A.12, subdivision 11, may be appealed to the board if the appeal is filed with the board and served on all other parties no later than 30 days after service of the commissioner's decision.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2007 · leading case: Petition for Decertification of an Exclusive Rep. Certain Employees of the Univ. of Minnesota, Unit 9, Crookston v. Univ. of Minnesota, 730 N.W.2d 300 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Petition for Decertification of an Exclusive Rep. Certain Employees of the Univ. of Minnesota, Unit 9, Crookston v. Univ. of Minnesota, 730 N.W.2d 300 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). “UEA specifically claims that because the university will be required to deal with UEA as the exclusive representative of Unit 9 and to comply with existing obligations under PELRA and university policies regardless of the outcome of the de-certification proceedings, the…”

In Re Petition for Decertification, 730 N.W.2d 300 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “UEA specifically claims that because the university will be required to deal with UEA as the exclusive representative of Unit 9 and to comply with existing obligations under PELRA and university policies regardless of the outcome of the decertification proceedings, the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.