Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 211C.04 (2026)

Proposed Petition; Submittal

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A petition to recall a state officer may be proposed by 25 or more persons, who must be eligible to sign and shall sign the proposed petition for the recall of the officer. The persons submitting the petition must designate in writing no more than three individuals among them to represent all petitioners in matters relating to the recall. The proposed petition must be submitted to the secretary of state in the manner and form required by the secretary of state and be accompanied by a fee of $100. After the secretary of state issues a petition to recall a state officer under section 211C.06, the secretary of state may not accept a proposed petition to recall the same officer until either the earlier petition is dismissed by the secretary of state for a deficiency of signatures under section 211C.06, or the recall election brought about by the earlier petition results in the officer retaining the office. Upon receiving a proposed petition that satisfies the requirements of this section, the secretary of state shall immediately notify in writing the state officer named and forward the proposed petition to the clerk of the appellate courts for action under section 211C.05.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2004 · leading case: In Re Ventura, 600 N.W.2d 714 (Minn. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Ventura, 600 N.W.2d 714 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 4× “*715 ORDER Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 211C.04 (1998), the secretary of state has referred a proposed petition to recall Governor Jesse Ventura to the chief justice for review.”

In Re Proposed Petition to Recall Sec'y of State Kiffmeyer, 673 N.W.2d 827 (Minn. 2004). · cites it 2× “That office determined that the proposed petition meets the signature requirements of Minn.Stat. § 211C.04 (2002), and on January 16, 2004 forwarded the proposed petition to the clerk of appellate courts in accordance with that statute.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.