§
Subdivision 1.Application; scope.
(a) A person desiring to operate as a household goods carrier shall file an application with the commissioner on a form the commissioner prescribes. No person shall knowingly make a false or misleading statement in an application.
(b) The commissioner shall issue the permit relating to it to an applicant who has filed an application complying with this subdivision, who has paid the required fee, and who has complied with the financial responsibility requirements in section 221.141. The commissioner shall not issue a permit to an applicant who has an unsatisfactory safety rating.
(c) A permit once granted continues in full force and effect until abandoned or unless suspended or revoked, subject to compliance by the permit holder with the applicable provisions of law and the rules of the commissioner governing permit carriers.
(d) All permits granted to household goods carriers must allow statewide operation. Notwithstanding any geographical restrictions imposed upon a permit at the time it was granted or any state law or rule to the contrary, the holder of a household goods permit may operate statewide.
§
Subd. 7.Fee.
The petitioner shall pay a fee of $150 into the treasury of the state of Minnesota for each permit applied for under this section.
Notes of Decisions
Signal Delivery Serv., Inc. v. Brynwood Transfer Co., 288 N.W.2d 707 (Minn. 1980).
· cites it 8× “to the Minnesota Public Service Commission for an intrastate contract carrier permit pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 221.121, subd. 1 (1978). They appeal from an order of the Ramsey County District Court, which reversed the order of the Commission denying the permit.”
Brinks, Inc. v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 355 N.W.2d 446 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 9× “That statute requires the Board (in this case the Commission) to issue a carrier’s permit: if it finds that petitioner is fit and able to conduct the proposed operations, that petitioner’s vehicles meet the safety standards established by the department [of transportation], that…”
Petition of D & a Truck Line, Inc., 524 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 10× “Minn.Stat. § 221.121, subd. 6c (1992). But a class II permit carrier may transport freight “to and from any point named in the permit, without restriction as to routes, schedules, or frequency of service.”
In Re the Jt. Petition of Space Ctr. Transp., 444 N.W.2d 575 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989).
· cites it 6× “The statutory scheme of carrier regulation in this state contemplates that companies seeking carrier permits will file a petition under Minn.Stat. § 221.121 (1988). Unlike section 221.”
Mitchell Transp., Inc. v. R.R. & Warehouse Comm'n, 137 N.W.2d 561 (Minn. 1965).
· cites it 5× “It is clear that the different kinds of carriers referred to in § 221.121 are categories of carriers such as contract, irregular route common, or charter, and not types of transportation service, as indicated by the definitions in § 221.”
N. Messenger, Inc. v. Airport Couriers, Inc., 376 N.W.2d 285 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 2× “Unlike Minn.Stat. § 221.121 (1984) which sets forth the requirements for permits such as an irregular route common carrier permit, Minn.”
Hyland v. State, 509 N.W.2d 561 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 221.121, subd. 1 (1988). The ALJ concluded that Ronald Hy-land “failed to demonstrate facts mitigating [his] willful and continuing disregard for the law applicable to motor carriers and * * * [failed to] show [he] would comply in the future.”
Petition of Fritz Trucking, Inc., 407 N.W.2d 447 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 2× “Permits * * issued under section 221.121 may be assigned or transferred but only upon the order of the board approving the transfer or assignment after notice and hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.