Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 237.28 (2026)

Burden Of Proof

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any investigation, action or proceeding arising under, or growing out of, an action initiated by the commission upon its own motion, the burden of proof shall be upon the telephone company to establish the reasonableness of the existing rates.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2003 · leading case: In Re the Deregulation of the Installation & Maint. of Inside Wiring, 420 N.W.2d 650 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re the Deregulation of the Installation & Maint. of Inside Wiring, 420 N.W.2d 650 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 237.28 (1986). Overall, therefore, the provisions of chapter 237 provide for two separate procedures: a rate case brought by a telephone company pursuant to Minn.”

In Re the Request for Serv. in Qwest's Tofte Exch., 666 N.W.2d 391 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 237.28 (2002) (“In any investigation, action or proceedings arising under, or growing out of, an action initiated by the commission upon its own motion, the burden of proof shall be upon the telephone company to establish the reasonableness of the existing rates.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.