Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 257. CHILDREN; CUSTODY, LEGITIMACY
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 257.022 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 257C.08]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases, 1980–2012 · leading case: Kulla v. McNulty, 472 N.W.2d 175 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kulla v. McNulty, 472 N.W.2d 175 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 58× “Appellant filed her petition pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 257.022 , subd. 2b (Supp.1989).”
Olson v. Olson, 534 N.W.2d 547 (Minn. 1995). · cites it 18× “In this case we consider the reach of grandparent visitation rights authorized under Minn.Stat. § 257.022, subd. 2 (1992 & Supp.”
Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000). · cites it 4× “19A, § 1803(3) (1998) (court may award grandparent visitation if in best interest of child and "would not significantly interfere with any parent-child relationship or with the parent's rightful authority over the child"); Minn. Stat. § 257.022 (2)(a)(2) (1998) (court may award…”
Rohmiller v. Hart, 811 N.W.2d 585 (Minn. 2012). · cites it 8× “In Simmons, a former stepparent petitioned for visitation rights under Minn.Stat. § 257.022, subd. 2b (1990) (renumbered Minn.”
Marriage of Simmons v. Simmons, 486 N.W.2d 788 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 22× “is limited to Minn.Stat. § 257.022 (1990). This statute is entitled “Rights of Visitation to Unmarried Persons.”
Joel v. Wellman, 551 N.W.2d 729 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 18× “and his mother lived with them from approximately May 1990 until October 1993.”
In Re Santoro, 594 N.W.2d 174 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 48× “As we do not uphold the award of visitation, we need not reach the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 257.022, subd. 1 (1994). Lisa Santoro and Michael Borgstrom married in 1982.”
Petition of Santoro, 578 N.W.2d 369 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 20× “Appellants Kenneth and Stella Borgstrom, the adoptive parents of their grandchildren, challenge the district court’s grant of visitation to the children’s other grandparents and assert that the grandparent visitation statute, Minn.Stat. § 257.022, subds. 1 and S (1996), is…”
In Re the Adoption of A.M.R., 527 N.W.2d 565 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 46× “After the divorce was finalized, the maternal grandfather, respondent Robert Schum, petitioned for, and was granted, visitation of the children under Minn.Stat. § 257.022, subd. 2 (Supp.1993).”
Geibe v. Geibe, 571 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 6× “We therefore hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Barbara failed to demonstrate a prima facie case for modification of custody. II. Visitation Under Minnesota law, a child generally must have “resided in a household with” a non-parent for at…”
Roth v. Weston, 789 A.2d 431 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 2× “Some states have done this expressly; see Minn. Stat. § 257.022 (2000) (permitting visitation with person with whom *221 child has established emotional ties creating parent-child relationship); Mont.”
In Re the Welfare of R.A.N., 435 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 12× “’s best interests because it concluded that absent a change in Minn.Stat. § 257.022 (1986) Ivan and Donna Wersal were not permitted visitation.”
Show all 34 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 257.022(2)(a)(2) — 3 cases
State Ex Rel. Brandon L. v. Moats, 551 S.E.2d 674 (W. Va. 2001).
E.H.G. v. E.R.G., 73 So. 3d 634 (Ala. 2011).
Ex Parte Erg, 73 So. 3d 634 (Ala. 2011).
— Minn. Stat. § 257.022(2)(a)(2)(1998) — 1 case
Hiller v. Fausey, 904 A.2d 875 (Pa. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.