Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 260. JUVENILE COURT; CHILD PLACEMENT; COMPACTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260.241 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 139 art 4 s 3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases, 1968–2012 · leading case: Matter of Welfare of JM, 574 N.W.2d 717 (Minn. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Welfare of JM, 574 N.W.2d 717 (Minn. 1998). · cites it 12× “Minn.Stat. § 260.241 (1996). It is equally true, though, that the termination of a parent's rights is not to be construed as an absolute prohibition on contact between a child and a parent if a judge deems such contact to be in the best interests of the child, pending adoption.”
In Re Est. of Braa, 452 N.W.2d 686 (Minn. 1990). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 260.241, subd. 1. Thus, the first exception is that a support obligation may not be terminated under specific circumstances.”
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Prods., Inc., 490 N.W.2d 888 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “1 (1990) (“clear and convincing evidence” required for the judicial commitment of mentally ill or chemically dependent persons); Minn.Stat. § 260.241, subd. 1 (1990) (grounds for the termination of parental rights must be proven by “clear and convincing evidence”).”
Zerby v. Brown, 160 N.W.2d 255 (Minn. 1968). · cites it 4× “The question has arisen *517 seemingly only because of an interim commission’s commentary on § 260.241, relating to legal custody and guardianship of minor children.”
Matter of Welfare of DDG, 558 N.W.2d 481 (Minn. 1997). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 260.241, subd. 1 (“[A]ll rights, powers, privileges, immunities, duties, and obligations, including any rights to custody, control, visitation, or support existing between the child and parent shall be severed and terminated and the parent [whose rights have…”
In re the Welfare of the Child. of K.S.F., 823 N.W.2d 656 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). “§ 260.241, subd. 1 (1978), the requirement that a basis for terminating parental rights be found “by clear and convincing evidence”).”
In Re the Welfare of L.A.F., 554 N.W.2d 393 (Minn. 1996). “§ 260.241, subd. 1. Foley maintains that she provided clear and convincing evidence that Daily abandoned L.”
Matter of Welfare of Copus, 356 N.W.2d 363 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 260.241, subd. 1 (1982); see In the Matter of the Welfare of Rosenbloom, 266 N.”
In Re the Welfare of R.A.N., 435 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 260.241, subd. 1 (1986). The statutory effect of Curtis Newberg’s adoption of R.”
Matter of Welfare of White, 363 N.W.2d 79 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 260.241, subd. 1 (1982); see In the Matter of the Welfare of Rosenbloom, 266 N.”
In Re the Welfare of K.P.C., 366 N.W.2d 711 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “ISSUE Was there clear and convincing evidence supporting the trial court’s decision to terminate the mother’s parental rights under Minn.”
In Re the Welfare of G.L.H., 604 N.W.2d 97 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 260.241, subd. 1 (1998). A parent, thus, has a significant interest "in the accuracy and injustice of the decision to terminate his or her parental rights.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.