Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 302A.783 (2026)

Right To Sue Or Defend After Dissolution

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

After a corporation has been dissolved, any of its former officers, directors, or shareholders may assert or defend, in the name of the corporation, any claim by or against the corporation.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2011 · leading case: Manty v. D56, Inc. (In Re Brose), 339 B.R. 708 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Manty v. D56, Inc. (In Re Brose), 339 B.R. 708 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2006). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 302A.783 (providing that, after dissolution of corporation, “any of its .”

Lyman Lumber Co. v. Favorite Constr. Co., 524 N.W.2d 484 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “Respondents claim, alternatively, that Minn.Stat. § 302A.783 (1992) compels a conclusion that Lyman Lumber could not bring suit against Favorite Construction.”

Colombe v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe, 835 F. Supp. 2d 736 (D.S.D. 2011). “” Minn.Stat. § 302A.783; see also Firstcom, Inc.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.