Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 323.29 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1997 c 174 art 12 s 68; 1998 c 262 s 12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1945–2009 · leading case: Hurwitz v. Padden, 581 N.W.2d 359 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998).
Hurwitz v. Padden, 581 N.W.2d 359 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “Minn.Stat. § 323.29 (1996). Despite a dissolution, a partnership relationship continues to exist until all issues involving the business of .”
Faegre & Benson, LLP v. R & R INVESTORS, 772 N.W.2d 846 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). “Minn.Stat. §§ 323.29, 323.37 (1996); see also Hurwitz, 581 N.”
Egner v. States Realty Co., 26 N.W.2d 464 (Minn. 1947). “Because the agency contract was terminated by operation of law by Lesch’s withdrawal from the partnership, there was no contract in existence for plaintiff to perform as the remaining member of the firm.”
Maus v. Galic, 669 N.W.2d 38 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “Minn. Stat § 323.29 (2000). The parties did not raise this discrepancy as an issue to be addressed by the trial court.”
H. F. Shepherdson Co. v. Cent. Fire Ins. Co., 19 N.W.2d 772 (Minn. 1945). “It is true that § 323.29 (§ 7413) provides that upon dissolution the partnership continues *407 until its affairs are wound up; but this, by virtue of § 323.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.