Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 325E.15 (2026)

Transfer Of Motor Vehicle; Mileage Disclosure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No person shall transfer a motor vehicle without disclosing to the transferee the true mileage registered on the odometer reading or that the actual mileage is unknown if the odometer reading is known by the transferor to be different from the true mileage. The regulations contained in Code of Federal Regulations, title 49, sections 580.1 to 580.17, that implement odometer disclosure requirements and prescribe the manner in which electronic or written disclosure must be made in this state are adopted by reference. No transferor shall violate any regulations adopted under this section or knowingly give a false statement to a transferee in making any disclosure required by the regulations.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2024 · leading case: Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity, 527 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. 1995).
Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity, 527 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. 1995). · cites it 44× “" Minn.Stat. § 325E.15. The rules promulgated under the authority of this statute provide that the transferor [3] of a motor vehicle must furnish, among other things, "the transferor's name and current address.”
Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity, 511 N.W.2d 472 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 10× “This form seems to be a composite of two statutory requirements: a disclosure of the odometer reading under Minn.Stat. § 325E.15 and a certification of title under Minn.”
Bachovchin v. Stingley, 504 N.W.2d 288 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 6× “16 provides that an injured person may recover costs *290 and disbursements, including attorney’s fees, and increased damages when Minn. Stat. § 325E.15 (1992) has been violated.”
Henley v. Neessen Chevrolet, Inc. (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 6× “§ 32705 ; Minn. Stat. § 325E.15. Minnesota Statute section 325E.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.