Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 325F.01 (2026)

Asbestos Used In Building And Remodeling

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Ban.

No person, corporation, partnership, joint venture, firm or association shall use, sell, deliver or receive, or contract to use, sell, deliver or receive powdered asbestos, whether in its powdered form or mixed with any other substance, and to be applied with a pressure sprayer, or in its molded form if asbestos dust will emanate from it due to handling, mixing or cutting, for purposes of constructing, remodeling or improving any building structure in this state.

Subd. 2.Criminal penalty.

Any violation of the provisions of subdivision 1 shall constitute a misdemeanor.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1982–2016 · leading case: DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co., 319 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co., 319 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 2× “Laws 2226 (codified at Minn.Stat. § 325F.01 (1980)). If there has been compliance with this law, more than six years have passed since the last act or omission of exposing workers in Minnesota to powdered asbestos occurred.”

Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc., 874 N.W.2d 303 (N.D. 2016). “See Minn.Stat. § 325F.01. In its answers to interrogatories Kuettel stated it became aware of the possible hazards associated with asbestos exposure in the early 1970s.”

Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc., 2016 ND 17 (N.D. 2016). “See Minn. Stat. § 325F.01. In its answers to interrogatories Kuettel stated it became aware of the possible hazards associated with asbestos exposure in the early 1970s.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.