Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 32A.04 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1993 c 65 s 15]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1981–2000 · leading case: Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Comm'r of Agric., 310 N.W.2d 99 (Minn. 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Comm'r of Agric., 310 N.W.2d 99 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 9× “*102 In June and August 1976, the commissioner issued two complaints against Red Owl, contending that it sold, offered and advertised for sale selected dairy products below cost in violation of a provision of the Dairy Act, Minn.Stat. § 32A.04, subd. l(o) (1978). “Cost,” as…”

In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota, 606 N.W.2d 697 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “1981) (explaining the commissioner of agriculture bears the ultimate burden of proving a violation of the Dairy Act even though Minn.Stat. § 32A.04, subd. 1 (1978) provided that proof of certain conduct is prima facie evidence of intent to violate the Act); Pahl v.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.