Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 332.50 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2001 Supp [Renumbered 604.113]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1995–2001 · leading case: Check Control, Inc. v. Anderson (In Re Anderson), 181 B.R. 943 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995).
Check Control, Inc. v. Anderson (In Re Anderson), 181 B.R. 943 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995). “The Plaintiff seeks a money judgment against the Defendant for the total face value of the checks, “plus any service charge and civil penalties assessed under” Minn.Stat. § 332.50, interest, and its attorney fees, costs and disbursements.”
Eric M. Picht v. Jon R. Hawks, Ltd., 236 F.3d 446 (8th Cir. 2001). “25 (the face value of the dishonored checks), $120 (for collection costs pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 332.50(2)(a) (1998)), $200 (for statutory damages for civil theft pursuant to Minn.”
Picht v. Hawks, 77 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (D. Minnesota 1999). “It is not, however, as Defendants added claims under Minn.Stat. §§ 332.50 and 332.51. These claims derive from statutory causes of action and may, for that reason alone, constitute claims other than those for money only.”
Metro Milwaukee Auto Auction v. Coulson, 604 N.W.2d 111 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). “' Minn.Stat. § 332.50, subd. 2(b), provides that civil liability for a dishonored check attaches if the check is not paid within 30 days after the holder mails to the drawer a notice of dishonor.”
Sonmore v. Checkrite Recovery Servs.., Inc., 187 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (D. Minnesota 2001). “Although Minn.Stat. § 332.50 subd. 2(b) permits a payee or holder to make a written demand for payment of the check amount, plus the maximum civil penalty ($100.”
Cederstrand v. Landberg, 933 F. Supp. 804 (D. Minnesota 1996). “In a letter dated December 12, 1994, defendant requestéd that plaintiff pay the amount of the dishonored cheek plus penalties imposed pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 332.50. 1 Plaintiff alleges that sending the letter violated the FDCPA.”
William E. Duffy v. Kevin W. Landberg, 215 F.3d 871 (8th Cir. 2000). “See Minn.Stat. Ann. § 332.50. With regard to the interest charges, the district court acknowledged the charges were “slightly inaccurate” according to the percentage rates in Minnesota Statute § 549.”
William E. Duffy v. Kevin W. Landberg, Attorney at Law New Concepts Bus. Servs., Sued as New Concepts Bus. Servs., Inc., a Minnesota Corp., Susan M. Quaderer v. Kevin W. Landberg, Attorney at Law New Concepts Bus. Servs., Sued as New Concepts Bus. Servs., Inc., a Minnesota Corp., Dennis G. Hacken v. Kevin W. Landberg, Attorney at Law New Concepts Bus. Servs., Sued as New Concepts Bus. Servs., Inc., a Minnesota Corp., 215 F.3d 871 (8th Cir. 2000). “See Minn. Stat. Ann. 332.50. 5 With regard to the interest charges, the district court acknowledged the charges were "slightly inaccurate" according to the percentage rates in Minnesota Statute 549.”
Eric M. Picht v. Jon R. Hawks, Ltd. (8th Cir. 2001). “25 (the face value of the dishonored checks), $120 (for collection costs pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 332.50 (2)(a) (1998)), $200 (for statutory damages for civil theft pursuant to Minn.”
— Minn. Stat. § 332.50(2)(a) — 1 case
Eric M. Picht v. Jon R. Hawks, Ltd., 236 F.3d 446 (8th Cir. 2001). “25 (the face value of the dishonored checks), $120 (for collection costs pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 332.50(2)(a) (1998)), $200 (for statutory damages for civil theft pursuant to Minn.”
— Minn. Stat. § 332.50(2)(b)(l) — 1 case
Eric M. Picht v. Jon R. Hawks, Ltd., 236 F.3d 446 (8th Cir. 2001). “25 (the face value of the dishonored checks), $120 (for collection costs pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 332.50(2)(a) (1998)), $200 (for statutory damages for civil theft pursuant to Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.