Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 347.56 (2026)

Destruction Of Dog In Certain Circumstances

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Circumstances.

Notwithstanding sections 347.51 to 347.55, a dog may be destroyed in a proper and humane manner by the animal control authority if the dog:

(1) inflicted substantial or great bodily harm on a human on public or private property without provocation;

(2) inflicted multiple bites on a human on public or private property without provocation;

(3) bit multiple human victims on public or private property in the same attack without provocation; or

(4) bit a human on public or private property without provocation in an attack where more than one dog participated in the attack.

Subd. 2.Hearing.

The animal control authority may not destroy the dog until the dog owner has had the opportunity for a hearing before an impartial decision maker. The definitions in section 347.50 and the exemptions under section 347.51, subdivision 5, apply to this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: In the Matter of the Determination of a Dangerous Animal Seizure & Order to Destroy (Minn. Ct. App. 2017).
In the Matter of the Determination of a Dangerous Animal Seizure & Order to Destroy (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “6 Cordry argues that the statutory definition for a proper enclosure controls because Minn. Stat. § 347.56 (2014) states that the definitions in section 347.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.