Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 363A. HUMAN RIGHTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 363A.01 (2026)

Citation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known as the "Minnesota Human Rights Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 93 cases (24 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Frieler v. Carlson Mktg. Grp., Inc., 751 N.W.2d 558 (Minn. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Frieler v. Carlson Mktg. Grp., Inc., 751 N.W.2d 558 (Minn. 2008). · cites it 4× “2d at 721-22 ; see also Minn.Stat. § 363A.01, subd. 41(3) (2000).”
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis, 923 N.W.2d 637 (Minn. 2019). · cites it 2× “Daniel then sued the City in December 2015, asserting claims under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 363A.01 -.44 (2018), and the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act, Minn.”
Baribeau v. City of Minneapolis, 596 F.3d 465 (8th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act ("MHRA"), Minn.Stat. § 363A.01 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City and its officers on the plaintiffs' claims, and in favor of the County and its employees on Sternberg's claims.”
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc., 925 N.W.2d 222 (Minn. 2019). · cites it 4× “McBee, who was experiencing back problems, brought suit against Team under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 363A.01 -.44 (2018), claiming that Team failed to engage in an interactive process to determine reasonable accommodations for her disability before Team…”
Brittany Tovar v. Essentia Health, 857 F.3d 771 (8th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “, the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. § 363A.01 et seq., and the Affordable Care Act (ACA), 42 U.”
Sandoval v. Am. Bldg. Maint. Indus., Inc., 578 F.3d 787 (8th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “§§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn.Stat. Ann. §§ 363A.01 to 363A.41, alleging sexual harassment, hostile workplace, and other employment-related claims.”
Brinkman v. Nasseff Mech. Contractors Inc., 251 F. Supp. 3d 1266 (D. Minnesota 2017). · cites it 2× “, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA), Minn. Stat. § 363A.01 et seq. Presently before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss.”
Disability Support All. v. Heartwood Enter., LLC, 885 F.3d 543 (8th Cir. 2018). “, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. §§ 363A.01, etseq. , and a "bias offense" that entitles them to recover damages and injunctive relief under Minnesota Statutes § 611A.”
Hervey v. Cnty. of Koochiching, 527 F.3d 711 (8th Cir. 2008). “, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. § 363A.01 et seq., alleging that her employer, Koochiching County, and supervisors Duane Nelson and John Mastín, discriminated against her on the basis of her sex, and retaliated against her for participation in a protected…”
Wenigar v. Johnson, 712 N.W.2d 190 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “The district court determined that respondent suffered disability discrimination and a hostile work environment due to his disability, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 363A.01, subd. 41, and that appellant should have known of the discrimination and hostile work place, which he…”
Roger Durand v. Fairview Health Servs., 902 F.3d 836 (8th Cir. 2018). “§ 794 ; and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. § 363A.01, et seq . Additionally, Priscilla alleges an injury independent of her parents' claim and asserts associational standing under the same statutes.”
Gary D. Brunckhorst v. City of Oak Park Heights, 914 F.3d 1177 (8th Cir. 2019). “, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. § 363A.01 et seq ., against his former employer, the City of Oak Park Heights (the City).”
Show all 93 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.