Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 463.16 (2026)
Repair Or Remove Hazardous Property Condition
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The governing body of any municipality may order the owner of any hazardous building or property within the municipality to correct or remove the hazardous condition of the building or property or to raze or remove the building.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1968–1995 · leading case: First Trust Co. v. Union Depot Place Ltd. P'ship, 476 N.W.2d 178 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991).
First Trust Co. v. Union Depot Place Ltd. P'ship, 476 N.W.2d 178 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “2 Minn.Stat. § 463.16 (1990) provides: The governing body of any city or town may order the owner of any hazardous building or property within the municipality to correct or remove the hazardous condition of the building or property or to raze or remove the building.”
Oswalt v. Cnty. of Ramsey, 371 N.W.2d 241 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Minn.Stat. § 463.16. Here appellant was given a notice demanding repair as an alternative to removal.”
Ukkonen v. City of Minneapolis, 160 N.W.2d 249 (Minn. 1968). “16 provides: “The governing body of any city, village, town, or borough may order the owner of any hazardous building within the munici *497 pality to correct the hazardous condition of such building or to raze or remove the same.”
City of Litchfield v. Schwanke, 530 N.W.2d 580 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). “The order must be in writing and recite the grounds therefor, specifying necessary repairs, if any, and providing a reasonable time for compliance, and state that, unless an answer is filed or corrective action taken, a motion for summary enforcement will be made. Minn.Stat. §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.